Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Posts posted by RANGERRAB

  1. It's not mate, it's a training complex for our first team which has an area in it for the youth department to work out of. It is not a youth academy at all.

     

    When it opened back in 2001 I recall SDM telling us it would be used to produce our own players instead of buying from other clubs. In that respect it has been a failure IMO.

    As for a first team training complex all I'd say is after watching these past two seasons against part timers and amateurs it isn't doing great there either.

    In all seriousness we should be getting a damn sight more out of MP than we are. If that means changing personnel then so be it

  2. I disagree, strongly in fact. The players were and are there but we have neither the brains nor ability to sell them on properly or to develop them further into first team regulars bar the very odd exception.

     

    McCormack, Adam and Hutton, 3 players who came through Auchenhowie with career transfer fees totalling around £40m. The sad bit is our club have only received less than a quarter of that. Other clubs are benefitting rather than us.

     

    Our club need to do more to utilise the talent that comes through, through sales and development. I think we all know that isn't going to happen though.

     

    If the young players really are there and they're not being developed then that issue needs addressed. Letting things continue as they are is not an option given what the MP running costs probably are

  3. Another well-written article by D'Art. FWIW I don't think we'll see results from the police investigation until HMRC finally admit defeat in all of this meaning they don't take this to the third and final stage i.e. to the Court of Session. Unfortunately I think they will meaning this drags on even longer.

    For me the biggest question of all is why HMRC went after Rangers for use of EBT's in the first place. Criticise SDM all you like but thousands of UK companies used EBT's as a perfectly legal means of tax avoidance including MIH as has been shown. so why did HMRC pursue Rangers? What was their case? It doesn't exactly look like much of a case when it has failed not one but two of HMRC's own internal appeals.I've long suspected this was initiated by rangers-hating parasites from the political world who used this to destabilise Rangers and deter reputable buyers. I believe two two individuals were involved both with links to the east end.

  4. That would be very smart decision; but I doubt he'll turn it down completely; most likely defer some or all over 2/3 years.

     

    What exactly does he need to do to earn this bonus I.e. What performance targets need to be met? Does anyone know?

  5. The way things are it isn't going to happen as GS says.

     

    That is when the fans will show their displeasure, and may be what King will wait for.

     

    2 years as someone said.

     

    For me DK is the problem not the solution. Too many have been taken in by this mythical 50m he's allegedly got.

    If we cant get promotion this season then something is badly wrong. Its the Scottish Championship we're in not the EPL or La Liga.

  6. The requisitioners had 30 percent of the shares and got nowhere.

     

    3 percent will do squat.

     

    As Ive said to you several times, if DK had purchased a shareholding since the AGM then added to the 30 percents the reqs got the board would have been in trouble. He didnt so the board have no reason to listen to him until such times as he gets a shareholding

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.