Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. FWIW I'm not against DK & co. I just want to know more about who is involved and what their plans are. You won't get their lapdogs and poodles asking these sort of questions though.
  2. As I said earlier, there's still too much unknown about King & co to make proper judgements about them
  3. Is the bit about DK being possibly be barred from being a Rangers director by AIM true or not presumably following his SA tax issues ? Or the SFA too?
  4. Do you know that for sure? Not much is known about King & co is there? Where's the funding coming from? All we've had is this £16m figure, half of which is from DK. Where's the rest from? Surely not loans
  5. Is King & co a single entity or several entities? If it were several surely existing shares could be bought by one or more for say 50p per share. Not enough is known about king & co IMO.
  6. King has already supposedly said he is not prepared to buy shares from existing shareholders so I don't see that happening nor do I see 75percent shareholder approval happening at an AGM either to allow king and co to get their 51 percent. We're heading for a stalemate unless either or both sides make concessions IMO
  7. where is he then? thought he wasn't going back to SA until all this got resolved
  8. I wouldn't rule anything out. Rangers need finance and if not from King & co then who? I just happen to believe King has played this out abysmally over the past year or so and have said so consistently so. He's left this too late in the day IMO
  9. King & Co will require the majority support of shareholders at an EGM or AGM to allow a shares issue which allowed the likes of KIng and Co to invest will they not? Will they get that majority?
  10. I wouldnt disagree with that but I think he would be more financialy beneficial for the longer term than King &co would be able to offer
  11. How many times have they won the EPL? How many times have they been in the CL? When did they last win anything? Is that what you call success?
  12. The kind of money required to be successful in the EPL is eye watering. just look at Man City and Chelsea. Ashley isnt willing to spend that sort of money at Newcastle hence he'd be willing to sell. Success at Rangers with an easier route into Europe may be more appealing to Ashley however.And most important of all it would not cost anywhere near as much as it would at Newcastle
  13. No theyre not but are you using that as a comparison to Rangers if they were owned by Ashley? Surely not.
  14. SAF once got a five game touchline ban for criticism of referees. Pardew got a seven game suspension and a £60k fine earlier this year. The Chelsea portuguese assistant got hammered when he lost the plot last season too No you're correct there's not that many. Managers down south dont risk it. Up here what Lennon got away with was nothing short of scandalous. Try causing a referees strke down there and lets see what happens as well as the usual stuff from him week in week out. I'll give til the end of the season at the latest.
  15. It has taken Lennon just one game to fall foul of match officials down south. How many games has Pardew been involved with as manager in england? If he did that on a regular basis(as I suspect TLB will) then the punishments would get more severe
  16. The FA down south dont take too kindly to this sort of behaviour towards their match officials.No Rhegan or Lunny to turn a blind eye down there.
  17. So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need? And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.