-
Posts
13,586 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Everything posted by RANGERRAB
-
FWIW I'm not against DK & co. I just want to know more about who is involved and what their plans are. You won't get their lapdogs and poodles asking these sort of questions though.
-
It's not the SA authorities he has to worry about though is it?
-
As I said earlier, there's still too much unknown about King & co to make proper judgements about them
-
Letham and park?
-
Is the bit about DK being possibly be barred from being a Rangers director by AIM true or not presumably following his SA tax issues ? Or the SFA too?
-
You know that for sure? How much are they each putting in?
-
Do you know that for sure? Not much is known about King & co is there? Where's the funding coming from? All we've had is this £16m figure, half of which is from DK. Where's the rest from? Surely not loans
-
Is King & co a single entity or several entities? If it were several surely existing shares could be bought by one or more for say 50p per share. Not enough is known about king & co IMO.
-
Who is MD ?
-
King has already supposedly said he is not prepared to buy shares from existing shareholders so I don't see that happening nor do I see 75percent shareholder approval happening at an AGM either to allow king and co to get their 51 percent. We're heading for a stalemate unless either or both sides make concessions IMO
-
where is he then? thought he wasn't going back to SA until all this got resolved
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Was he forced to sell Rangers? And by whom?- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Was he forced to sell Rangers?- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
I wouldn't rule anything out. Rangers need finance and if not from King & co then who? I just happen to believe King has played this out abysmally over the past year or so and have said so consistently so. He's left this too late in the day IMO- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
King & Co will require the majority support of shareholders at an EGM or AGM to allow a shares issue which allowed the likes of KIng and Co to invest will they not? Will they get that majority?- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
I wouldnt disagree with that but I think he would be more financialy beneficial for the longer term than King &co would be able to offer- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
How many times have they won the EPL? How many times have they been in the CL? When did they last win anything? Is that what you call success?- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
The kind of money required to be successful in the EPL is eye watering. just look at Man City and Chelsea. Ashley isnt willing to spend that sort of money at Newcastle hence he'd be willing to sell. Success at Rangers with an easier route into Europe may be more appealing to Ashley however.And most important of all it would not cost anywhere near as much as it would at Newcastle- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
No theyre not but are you using that as a comparison to Rangers if they were owned by Ashley? Surely not.- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Neil Lennon: Bolton appoint ex-Celtic boss as manager
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in General Football Chat
SAF once got a five game touchline ban for criticism of referees. Pardew got a seven game suspension and a £60k fine earlier this year. The Chelsea portuguese assistant got hammered when he lost the plot last season too No you're correct there's not that many. Managers down south dont risk it. Up here what Lennon got away with was nothing short of scandalous. Try causing a referees strke down there and lets see what happens as well as the usual stuff from him week in week out. I'll give til the end of the season at the latest. -
Neil Lennon: Bolton appoint ex-Celtic boss as manager
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in General Football Chat
It has taken Lennon just one game to fall foul of match officials down south. How many games has Pardew been involved with as manager in england? If he did that on a regular basis(as I suspect TLB will) then the punishments would get more severe -
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
HH voted with the reqs at the last AGM. Opponents? Id say so. Not any more theyre not- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Neil Lennon: Bolton appoint ex-Celtic boss as manager
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in General Football Chat
The FA down south dont take too kindly to this sort of behaviour towards their match officials.No Rhegan or Lunny to turn a blind eye down there. -
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
To eliminate a potential opponent HH- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need? And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week- 141 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 17 more)