Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,586

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    Hypocritical scumbag. If he hates this country so much why is he living and working in it.
  2. RANGERRAB
    A very good buy ???? we got him for free on a BOSMAN. But yes he's done very well. My only concern is jig playing alongside him who has certainly slowed down & McGREGOR will need his pace to compensate for that.
  3. RANGERRAB
    You fail to appreciate Craig that King by refusing to acquire a shareholding sealed his own fate. When you say 'recommended' you fail to understand it is for the shareholders to vote on. Not the board. Ultimately it is for the shareholders to decide regardless of what the board say.Sadly you have all been strung along by King and his cohorts. He never did want to part with his money so he made an 'offer' which he knew would fail. King and his gang could have got shares like everyone else. They didn't. End of story
  4. RANGERRAB
    Utter nonsense.It needed an AGM or EGM for shareholder approval. King puuled the wools over your eyes. He never had any intention of parting with his money so he made an impractical offer. He is history. Get over it
  5. RANGERRAB
    His 'offer' was a non-starter. It couldnt be accepted or rejected by the board. Probably did it to impress his deluded band of followers who still think he is being denied ownership of Rangers. He isnt - unless he's willing to stump up the cash and buy a significant shareholding which he says he's not willing to do.
  6. RANGERRAB
    The board couldnt accept or reject. They weren't in a position to do either. As I said earlier it was/is a shareholders decision
  7. RANGERRAB
    King's offer wasn't rejected. It was an offer for 51% of the business. That is not for the board to decide. That's for shareholders to vote on but he didnt have enough support from shareholders to call an EGM presumably
  8. RANGERRAB
    he put that money into Murray Sports(or whatever it was called). did he get it back though?
  9. RANGERRAB
    Templeton is more of a goal threat than the likes of Steven Smith & I don't understand why Aird would start ahead of Templeton.
  10. RANGERRAB
    Just what would Ally waste £10m on I wonder?
  11. RANGERRAB
    I think we have to wait until we're back in the top division to see what ambition they really have.No one is or was going to throw silly money around buying players and putting them on ridiculous salaries(by that I mean the likes of £15k or £20k p.w.) whilst we were playing basically amateur and part time opposition
  12. RANGERRAB
    Not sure I follow what you mean but I'd disagree if you are suggesting Rangers supporters nowadays have less ambitions than before. Most I know cannot to get back to the top division and winning it
  13. RANGERRAB
    I think a lot of other clubs supporters would say the same time thing about their own clubs. Time moves on. Things change. Football clubs are not immune from change either. I'd argue Rangers changed almost as soon as SDM arrived.
  14. RANGERRAB
    Any true Rangers men(or women) getting involved in an interview like this with the likes of McGowan should,frankly, know better. These people have an agenda which is to maximise every bit of bad news or publicity about Rangers in whatever way they can.
  15. RANGERRAB
    I think it needs to be established if SDM was forced to sell by LBG and for what reasons. Hopefully when the various police investigations conclude we'll get some answers
  16. RANGERRAB
    PM compiled a complete dossier on Whyte and was allegedly stunned at his business history. He couldnt believe he was being allowed to acquire RANGERS. What more evidence did anyone(including the SFA) need to stop Whyte?
  17. RANGERRAB
    Didnt keep it covered for too long then did he? PM,AJ etc all warned about Whyte and were proved to be spot on. Surely even you can see at the SFA these days who calls the shots with the various placemen(and women) there. Letting Whyte get Rangers benefited one club by allowing an easy CL passport every year and the money that brings
  18. RANGERRAB
    i can assure I was not 'one of those cheering him on from the sidelines'. A colleague at the place I worked at the time knew all about Whyte's past. When Whyte got Rangers what happened next was inevitable. The SFA's role in all of this was incomprehensible given the countless warnings they got. Perhaps in was a case of obeying orders
  19. RANGERRAB
    If he was a disqualified director why didnt the SFA not try to prevent him getting Rangers ?
  20. RANGERRAB
    Fobbed off by his lawyers ? they allowed him to buy Rangers with ticketus money. Didnt take long for JT & KJ to discover that did it?
  21. RANGERRAB
    Call me a cynic but why didnt the SFA show this level of concern about RANGERS when Whyte emerged on the scene and bought Rangers ? Are they suggesting they didnt know anything about Whyte ? AJ & PM certainly did. So did Jeff Randall on SKY business news. I can perfectly understand why Ashley would blank the SFA
  22. RANGERRAB
    The SFA wanting to adhere to agreements/rules LOL. This was the organisation who were told by Lord Glennie their registration embargo was unlawful was forced Rangers into accepting it anyway.
  23. RANGERRAB
    Because I reckon Rangers absence in the top division is now seriously beginning to affect some clubs.Take Motherwell for example whom Stuart McCall left on sunday. They'll have missed out on 5 or 6 home games against Rangers by the end of this season which I'd guess will cost them somewhere between £2m to £3m.A lot of money fora club like them I'd have thought but still they did choose to vote Rangers out the then SPL. Hell mend them I say
  24. RANGERRAB
    I wouldnt bet against league reconstruction. Scottish football's top division cannot sustain Rangers absence indefinitely
  25. RANGERRAB
    Punished for fictitious EBT tax liabilties which continue to be unproven which largely contributed to the laughable debt figure quoted of £134m. Strachan should ask the 10 SPL chairmen or CEO's why they voted Rangers out of the top division. Start with Liewell. Their responses would be interesting given what's happened since
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.