Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,589

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    no mentions of the bhoys at the bank yet?
  2. RANGERRAB
    that will disappoint a few on here. hoping for green & co
  3. RANGERRAB
    All 4 will be known to us. Just wait and see..................
  4. RANGERRAB
    All 4 will be known to us. Just wait and se..................
  5. RANGERRAB
    Good player but no more than that. I wouldn't have thought LB was top priority given we already have Smith & Wallace. Once again looks like Ally signing who's available rather than what is needed to improve the starting XI
  6. RANGERRAB
    Was always going to be difficult. Their soft loans with the CIS bank is another matter however. why were they given such preferential treatment and by whom? This will de different. It not the EC theyre dealing with this time but westminster.
  7. RANGERRAB
    £50m million investment !!!' from whom?
  8. RANGERRAB
    And how would you address these concerns then? We were never going to make money going up these divisions unless you think we could play a team of teenagers earning peanuts If the truth be told we've supporters groups going round implying that the current custodians are guilty of theft on a grand scale inside Rangers and people shouldnt go to games as a result.Whilst I have reservations about certain board members I don't accept that viewpoint. Also many of our fans groups are nothing more than mere patsys for DK & PM.
  9. RANGERRAB
    Who would provide the 'long term sustainable funding' mentioned in their statement? Did no one ask?
  10. RANGERRAB
    He couldn't have got those shares(51% I believe) without shareholder approval granting an EGM. That was never going to happen. Ashley won't withhold the retail money forever. It will be released in due course
  11. RANGERRAB
    DK's spokesman Chris Graham giving his usual quotes I see. DK needs to acquire shares if he wishes any credibility.
  12. RANGERRAB
    Ashley hasn't done that yet. As I've said on here many times our no1 priority must be to get back to the top division. Once that happens I believe things will happen. No point throwing vast sums of money at this stage which was why I thought King's 'offer' was bogus
  13. RANGERRAB
    Rangers need financial stability. Ashley can provide that.We should encourage him to invest IMO. Too many of our supporters are still living in hope(!) Dave King will take over which won't happen.
  14. RANGERRAB
    Rangers must be the only club in the world who have got supporters opposed to being owned/controlled by a genuine billionaire.........
  15. RANGERRAB
    It's already been clarified several times. Doing it again won't stop the pondlife persisting with the 'new club' nonsense. Only legal action will
  16. RANGERRAB
    Where are the SFA & SPFL here ? there's no debate whatsoever regards the club. 'Sporting continuity' declared the club continued after its corporate identity changed. If Thompson is still in any doubt someone should show him the Rangers section of the SPFL website. It clearly shows FOUNDED 1872
  17. RANGERRAB
    And much as some may struggle to accept it Green got the finance in place to rebuild Rangers whilst the so-called net worth Rangers men sat back and did nothing comparible(I don't count the TBK)
  18. RANGERRAB
    Rubbish. get a life. Your arguement falls apart when Whyte gets mentioned
  19. RANGERRAB
    Yawn....much as though I have reservations about the Easdales they don't take a single penny in salary from Rangers.
  20. RANGERRAB
    Didn't know that.....
  21. RANGERRAB
    A I can understand reasons for avoiding McCall and MacInnes but Davies has proved he can manage in a tough league like the CHampionship down south. My preference would be a foreign manager with scottish coaches. Unlike you I'll offer a name -Dan Petrescu...
  22. RANGERRAB
    Whilst I cannot condone anyone being challenged in the presence of their kids, it cannot be denied that the Easdales continue to attract bad publicity for Rangers in various ways. I genuinely believe it would be better for them and Rangers if they left sooner rather than later. I have no knowledge (or interest) of the Easdales' past business dealings but if these are connected to this sort of incident and others then I'd say their positions as Rangers directors are pretty much untenable
  23. RANGERRAB
    I don't think they'd have the financial resources to do that
  24. RANGERRAB
    Their continuing presence on the Rangers board seems to me to be extremely unpopular with a large section of our support. There must come a time when they are seen as a liability and would need to be removed. But how?
  25. RANGERRAB
    He will get publicity unfortunately.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.