Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,589
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. And,of course, was SDM forced to sell to Whyte ? No work was done to 'tidy up' Whyte's business history. AJ and PM said plenty about him at the time
  2. Unfortunately I'd need to disagree. I dont think our youths are good enough and this was one of the few things McCoist got right. For example, the likes of McKay and Crawford dont seem to be able to get a game for Morton !!! Only McLeod looks anywhere near what we require IMO
  3. Darren McGregor?
  4. Someone once said on a forum(dont think it was this one) was that when Rangers went to the bottom division it was like winning the lottery for any SPL journeymen who happened to be out of contract at that time.In order to get them to play in the bottom tier we had to pay them a higher rate than they'd have got elsewhere.And that's what happened. money well spent? Probably not.
  5. We didnt BUY any players in the summer we acquired a number of players on Bosmans and maybe that is part of the problem i.e. Trying to do things on the cheap
  6. The bonuses to which you refer are small beer in comparison to what I've read it would cost to get rid off Ally, I've read it would cost £1.6m. If that is true then serious questions need to be asked
  7. It wasn't the current board who set Ally's onerous remuneration contract.It was Martin bloody Bain and it got TUPE'd over to the newco.FWIW I think they would have got rid off him by now were it not for the exorbitant costs involved. How this will end I have no idea
  8. Depressing isn't it? It wouldn't be so bad if you could see genuine progress since 2012 & the team was good to watch but neither has happened. Those who constantly attack the board(and some of their criticism is valid I agree) need to realise also that significant resources such as this £20m salaries figure have been made available to a manager who continues not to make best use of these resources and his position should now be untenable as a result
  9. And that the oldco was never insolvent. Well with HMRC's continuing failure with their EBT tax case and today's news he is certainly looking spot on with at least one of them
  10. Welcome though today's news may be it still does not answer how Whyte managed to acquire Rangers so easily despite the warnings from the likes of AJ & PM who clearly knew all about his past and said so at the time. I've always had my doubts about SDM willingly selling to Whyte(did LBG or Muir force the sale?) and why did HMRC not prevent it given Whyte already had tax arrears with them then almost inexplicably they then proceded to allow him to run up even more arrears by withholding PAYE & NI contributions at Rangers. Not to mention the non-action by our SFA in stopping Whyte taking over Rangers at the time and subsequently they allowed Rangers to be thrown out the top division and withholding prize monies amongst other punishments after Whyte's ownership went disastrously wrong leading to administration/liquidation of oldco. Did they never consider Rangers might have been the victim rather than appearing desperate to hand out whatever punishments they could as often as they could.FWIW I believe Regan's position has been untenable at the SFA for some time now because of this It remains to be seen now if there are to be further arrests. Only time will tell
  11. LOL. It's nowhere near conclusion and would even be a decade away or more. When the old Airdrie FC went out of business in 2002 it took ten years to finally wind up their oldco (Airdrie Utd emerged as a result of a few businessman buying the old Clydebank FC and renaming it as the experts will tell you on here)
  12. you would think it could potentially open up several cans of worms............ Getting punished for being the victim ......
  13. if indeed Whyte's takeover is proven fraudulent where does that leave the Scottish football authorities with their punishments i.e. withholding prize money, transfer embargo, demotion to thirds division etc etc ?
  14. these two were fairly obvious. The other two will be more interesting....................
  15. The Ticketus stuff is over. Whyte lost on appeal. He has to pay back Ticketus £18M or whatever it was he obtained thro' fraudulent misrepresentation'.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.