Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    12,967
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. Another administration would be catastrophic. You might want to go to the bottomtier of Scottish football again I don't.
  2. or how about getting someone else to take the freekicks & corners who CAN clear the first defender ? very simple. It's called organisation.
  3. There are hurdles preventing him doing so at present but hopefully that will be the positive outcome in all of this. We urgently need investment and Ashley can provide that. The current financial structure with multi-ownership set up by CG simply doesnt work. We can see that.We need a single owner able to call the shots. It is the only feasible way forward
  4. does anyone genuinely believe Ibrox will be renamed THE SPORTS DIRECT ARENA for £1 ? Is it not exclusivity that Mike Ashley got ?
  5. When I watch Rangers I continue to see free kicks and corners which don't clear the first defender, needlessly giving away possession under no pressure, consistent lack of a gameplan and tactics almost every week, lack of progress in first team particularly young players from MP, players played out of position not performing to a standard we might expect......I could go on and on. We may differ about who runs Rangers but all of these stem from a very poor football management which badly needs addressed.
  6. If he was genuinely interested in taking over Rangers he would have some sort of shareholding by now instead of coming up with excuses.The fact he hasn't along with what he told our incumbent board about being the 'last resort' as it was his kids inheritance tells you all you need to know. He ain't coming. Get over it.
  7. So you really just want to replace the incumbent board with another board of your choice. But shareholders remain same? Would that be the likes of Paul Murray & Malcolm Murray ? Dave King? Isnt that what the likes of the SoS & UoF have wanted all along? What makes you think they'd do a better job? Malcolm Murray for example was chairman when we were blowing millions in SFL3.
  8. and how do you propose to bring about 'a quick end to their reign' as you say? another administration would be catastrophic IMO. And who would your new owners be ?
  9. if they're unsuitable(and I'm not saying they're not) then get shot off them. How to do that without destroying the clubfor many years to come is the key question.
  10. he would not need to spend anywhere near £30m to get control of Rangers
  11. As the Board have a legal obligation to maintain the business as a viable concern they may have no alternative. I genuinely hope we do not see that day
  12. At the end of the administration there was only one viable bid on the table. Why didnt McColl Co bid earlier?
  13. If the potential investor who 'has declared the willigness to invest £30m' would acquire some sort of shareholding then we might have more grounds for optimism.
  14. Because he & the board are afraid to sack McCoist
  15. He'd by the biggest single shareholder by far. The board would be incredibly stupid to ignore him were that the case.
  16. Makes you wonder why DK didn't want to underwrite the shares offer.He'd likely have been in a pretty strong position if he had for a couple of million quid(assuming he already has some sort of shareholding)
  17. Granted Wallace is on a rather excessive contract for where we are(£315k p.a plus bonus) but other board members aren't. My bigger concern is how they intend to take Rangers back to the top of Scottish football and back into Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.