Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,595

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    Probably the ones you think should be allowed to take over Rangers but won't buy shares in it
  2. RANGERRAB
    if the truth be told too many put their faith in so-called networth 'Rangers Men' who aren't/weren't prepared to buy the club
  3. RANGERRAB
    No retraction whatsoever. Both full of their own self-importance. Both DK patsys hoping for a role should he ever get Rangers by spending his kids inheritence. Won't happen
  4. RANGERRAB
    Malky looking for his old job back maybe? But wants to inflict as much damage on Rangers in order to do so. Be careful what you wish for Malky.
  5. RANGERRAB
    his ilk represent a small insignificant band of our support. Just ignore them
  6. RANGERRAB
    Well they both seem to think they have some sort of authority. Graham is little more than a DK patsy anyway
  7. RANGERRAB
    How I look forward to the day Graham and Houston realise they are not the representatives of ALL Rangers supporters but only the small groups they represent
  8. RANGERRAB
    D&P are under investigation for their dealings with Whyte not Green. My guess has always been Whyte wanted his own administrators so as he could get Rangers back post admin debt free but that was never going to happen after they found out what he'd been up to. I suspect the fraud charges lead to the acquisition and running of Rangers up to & including administration
  9. RANGERRAB
    Ok I'll go now.....night night everyone
  10. RANGERRAB
    At the start of administration there were four bidders: Bill Ng, Bill Miller, Kennedy and TBK. Kennedy's bid got thrown out for being too low, TBK didnt have sufficient funding and Ng withdrew. Miller got preferred bidder status but got cold feet(no doubt the Yankee go home nonsense from FF didn't help). Green's consortium came in with offers of £8.5m if the CVA got approved & £5.5m for newco. McColl co appeared at the eleventh hour trying to hijack proceedings. One might ask why they waited so late in the day to bid. The rest is history as Green's consortium won. Were Kennedy and MCColl serious bidders? Not in my book. The messiah DK of course had SARS issues in SA so couldnt bid at that time.
  11. RANGERRAB
    They want a Rangers run by DK, PM, MM etc. Graham,Houstoun and Dingwall would probably get roles too. It aint gonna happen though.
  12. RANGERRAB
    During administration/liquidation McColl and Kennedy could easily have got Rangers had the put in reputable bids at the right time.They didnt. As for the messiah DK I'll let people mind their own minds up. I know I certainly have
  13. RANGERRAB
    DK might fool you. He'll never fool me.
  14. RANGERRAB
    Face facts. In our darkest hour the networth Rangers men never showed up.
  15. RANGERRAB
    That's going to be one hell of a long game if Ashley increases his stake to just under 30percent. The more astute amongst us should ask if he genuinely wants to own Rangers
  16. RANGERRAB
    If he was genuinely interested in owning/controlling Rangers then he'd buy from existing shareholders. Like Laxey did. like Prior did. like Ashley did.As they all increased their stakes. He wont be able t buy in the forthcoming share issue as I dont think he's a shareholder.
  17. RANGERRAB
    Doing their bit to what? Trying to ensure Rangers cease to exist? Thankfully you lot are small in numbers. Crowds will return when the product on the park improves. Start a new club? On you go. Good idea. Why not see if DK will fund it?
  18. RANGERRAB
    When you mention the word 'saviour' I believe that is the root of the problem we are in.Too many in our support have had their heads turned by the likes of McColl, Kennedy and King.If these men genuinely wanted Rangers then they should have gone about it in the only way possible by acquiring a shareholding.There is no other way. The fact they havent tells me all I need to know. A new Rangers is just plain laughable as far as I'm concerned.
  19. RANGERRAB
    Wouldnt work.Complete non starter but good luck anyway. Only one Rangers for me. Same one I started watching in the mid 70's
  20. RANGERRAB
    On you go. Form your new club. I may even come and watch sometimes when the big Rangers are away from home
  21. RANGERRAB
    Good luck and Goodbye.
  22. RANGERRAB
    New Rangers? LOL. Good luck with the funding.
  23. RANGERRAB
    Destroy us? LOL
  24. RANGERRAB
    Checking what? Checking who? Who is being investigated who has been involved Rangers since newco? The result is not the same. Tens of millions LOL. You just make things up to suit your agenda don't you ?
  25. RANGERRAB
    LOL good answer. Youve obviously little to do witt the construction though
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.