Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,969

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    King & Co will require the majority support of shareholders at an EGM or AGM to allow a shares issue which allowed the likes of KIng and Co to invest will they not? Will they get that majority?
  2. RANGERRAB
    I wouldnt disagree with that but I think he would be more financialy beneficial for the longer term than King &co would be able to offer
  3. RANGERRAB
    How many times have they won the EPL? How many times have they been in the CL? When did they last win anything? Is that what you call success?
  4. RANGERRAB
    The kind of money required to be successful in the EPL is eye watering. just look at Man City and Chelsea. Ashley isnt willing to spend that sort of money at Newcastle hence he'd be willing to sell. Success at Rangers with an easier route into Europe may be more appealing to Ashley however.And most important of all it would not cost anywhere near as much as it would at Newcastle
  5. RANGERRAB
    No theyre not but are you using that as a comparison to Rangers if they were owned by Ashley? Surely not.
  6. RANGERRAB
    SAF once got a five game touchline ban for criticism of referees. Pardew got a seven game suspension and a £60k fine earlier this year. The Chelsea portuguese assistant got hammered when he lost the plot last season too No you're correct there's not that many. Managers down south dont risk it. Up here what Lennon got away with was nothing short of scandalous. Try causing a referees strke down there and lets see what happens as well as the usual stuff from him week in week out. I'll give til the end of the season at the latest.
  7. RANGERRAB
    It has taken Lennon just one game to fall foul of match officials down south. How many games has Pardew been involved with as manager in england? If he did that on a regular basis(as I suspect TLB will) then the punishments would get more severe
  8. RANGERRAB
    HH voted with the reqs at the last AGM. Opponents? Id say so. Not any more theyre not
  9. RANGERRAB
    The FA down south dont take too kindly to this sort of behaviour towards their match officials.No Rhegan or Lunny to turn a blind eye down there.
  10. RANGERRAB
    To eliminate a potential opponent HH
  11. RANGERRAB
    So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need? And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week
  12. RANGERRAB
    Who? Sbragia?
  13. RANGERRAB
    LOL. do you think he'll last that long? Especially after Bolton get relegated. They've no money remember
  14. RANGERRAB
    Who told you that?
  15. RANGERRAB
    You miss the point Craig. Bolton have accrued a massive debt living out with their means (no they've not gone into administration ) and Lennon, whilst Manager over at the east end, accused Rangers of financial doping when we were supposedly living out with our means by accruing the now discredited debt figure of £134m whilst in administration. Yes I do think he is a hypocrite for taking the Bolton job after all he said about Rangers alleged debts whilst the east end manager
  16. RANGERRAB
    Which will be a lot harder than most people seem to think. Lose and we may well be finished. I think it is that clear cut even at this early stage
  17. RANGERRAB
    Let's just see if Scotland actually qualify for Euro2016 before we start lavishing all the praise on the current Scotland management. I happen to think they'll have a difficult job beating Oirlund at the San giro next month. Lose that one and I think things might become very awkward indeed with both Poland and Oirlund starting well in the group
  18. RANGERRAB
    How does he need 100percent? Didnt Keef do maths or arithmetic at school?
  19. RANGERRAB
    How did these hedge funds manage to suck millions out of us? Who got what and how much? Please tell us
  20. RANGERRAB
    What I'd rather hoped this was what the VB article would have been about was why Rangers were allowed to be voted out the then SPL. Regan & Doncaster rather neglected their duties in allowing club chairmen to vote on this issue IMO. What were their reasons for Rangers being thrown out? What has since transpired is that Rangers were indeed the victim of a fraudulent sale to Whyte & Rangers didnt owe anywhere near the much-quoted, laughable figure of £134m made up mostly of EBT tax liabilities at which HMRC now failed at both the FTTT & UTTT stages. Both of these (and whatever else) wasnt known at that time so of the vote what made therse chairmen vote as they did? Could these clubs now face financial claims as a result of these clubs' chairmen voting as they did?
  21. RANGERRAB
    Wont this need to be approved at an AGM or EGM? Not much chance of that happening I wouldnt have thought
  22. RANGERRAB
    Thought it was £30m ?
  23. RANGERRAB
    Don't you think if Rangers were run properly it wouldnt need propped up by loans? By that I mean a decent scouting system, a youth set-up which provides players for the first team, not paying players over 30 £10K plus per week, etc, etc Why shouldnt Rangers be self-sustaining & profitable?
  24. RANGERRAB
    I think your first sentence hits the nail on the head. There are too many unknowns & uncertainties about DK for my liking.I'm not convinced he's as wealthy as some make out for starters.
  25. RANGERRAB
    Good to see Goughie talking sense. The UoF & SoS won't like this
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.