RANGERRAB

But I think they should explain what they said & why they said it.

They unleashed the anti-sectarianism tiger which has turned to maul them

First of all Naismith would need to come clean & tell us who it was who was behind the 'I dont want to play for Sevco' nonsense at THAT press conference Were Wishart's players union's legal mob Bridge Litigation involved ? FWIW I dont think theres anything left in accusing these players as money-grabbers after what was to emerge about McCoist's remuneration and contractual details

Laffferty must be on at least £10k p.w. or more at Norwich (he's out on loan at present). There's no way we'd pay him that sort of wage again

No he didnt. The yahoos paid £1m less for Hooper. Who got the better desl?

He was never worth what WS paid for him in 2008 & was never a prolific scorer in the four years at Rangers. I believe he's on loan at some Turkish club from Norwich & is probably on the look out for a new club as Norwich dont want him back. Keep looking Kyle.....

Celt@c say Guidetti will be defending the charge. How can he ? Are they saying the use of the word hun is acceptable ? Are they saying he didnt do it? Have to say I'm genuinely surprised at this? Are the SFA trying to be even-handed?

Yes because he sung an offensive song about Rangers. Absolutely disgraceful his club (or rather the club he is on loan at) cannot acknowledge this

There is no way Green will be back. None whatsoever

They never sent us to the fourth tier. They(& others) only voted us out the SPL and we then had to apply for SFL membership. It was the SFL clubs who voted to put as in SFL3 as it was known then

Can you see him doing it if he gets the expected runaround tomorrow? I can't

McCulloch is the problem not the solution

Ridiculous statement from our interim manager. Does he consider McCulloch indispensable? He is well past his best(whatever that was) and is now being accommodated at CB which is a position he cannot play well enough to be in the team. Stuart McCall's two predecessors this season both resolutely stood by Lee McCulloch and both should now realise he was a major factor in their demise. If McCall doesn't realise this he will meet the same fate

Perhaps we shouldn't read too much into McCall's comments then. If McCall remains manager next season then new players will be needed from somewhere. Maybe one or two of these players may be a possibility if they can prove themselves.They do have a better pedigree coming from an EPL club than some of the players we've had over these past few years. What we mustn't do again, like Ally McCoist did too often, was to get out of contract players from the top division in this country and offer them whacking great wage increases to drop down divisions to play for us.These were mostly older players too with little or no possible sell-on fee

Perhaps after four years at Rangers Lee may think it is time to move on at the end of he season. If he does go he should go with our best wishes as he was one of those who stayed with us in the summer of 2012 when others didn't. Some of us on here would do well to remember that

Remy Streete's contract runs out in the summer too I believe. I've taken the view that Newcastle want rid off these players and are using Rangers as a shop window for them. If theyre any good then maybe we'd get first option on them but at present I'd say that very unlikely due to the non-appearances I dont understand McCall's comments about Ferguson after Newcastle manager Carver said he was only 2 or 3 weeks away from playing.

Oh dear are the Rangers-haters all falling out with each other? Surely not

The SFA will not & cannot do anything if he is cleared by the Court of Session.

I cannot believe Boyd is in the squad after that ridiculous performance on Tuesday. Is McCulloch going to play CB again ? Against Jason Cummings? Surely not Between now & the end of the season McCall has major decisions to take which will determine whether we get promoted or not. He seems to be avoiding them as far as I can see

In the forth paragraph Craig I am referring to the clubs' supporters not HMRC. We will need to disagree about outside influence in all of this and I never mentioned the ridiculously named FARE organisation with their listening devices at Rangers European home games at the time.I would say however I have all the stories about who were involved and these haven't just come from Rangers supporters.I do wonder if the Labour party's imminent collapse in Scotland at the forthcoming General Election is linked in any way.

Clubs were being blackmailed by their fans over our alleged debts, the bulk of which was the EBT tax bill. We were supposed to have used players we couldn't otherwise have afforded as a result of these debts.They deliberately overlooked that administration/liquidation was solely due to Whyte not paying over PAYE/NI to HMRC who sought a winding up order as a result But that came crashing down on the afternoon of Tuesday 20th November 2012 when the FTTT ruled in Rangers favour. Subsequently the UTTT did likewise and we now await HMRC wasting more taxpayers money when it gets embarrassed in the courts. The Celt@c-controlled SPL & SFA sought to have these EBT's declared illegal side contracts but LNS booted that out with his 'no sporting advantage' judgement.It was one club's crude attempt to get titles & trophies stripped from its more successful rival. I ask again on what basis did these club chairmen reach their decision to be allowed to remove Rangers from the SPL ? If they really did canvass their supporters (and I seriously doubt many did to any great extent) what evidence did they get to reach their decision? Were their fans all tax & debt experts? If so I'd suggest them to be pretty incompetent. I've long since suspected our removal from the SPL was Liewell's ultimate aim to allow Celt@c a virtual free run at the CL revenue every year. No SPL club would dare back Rangers for fear of a boycott from the green-n-grey hooped hordes when they visited.Rangers got voted out and winning the title has been like shooting fish in a barrel every year for Celt@c. But I've always believed there was a master plan designed to financially cripple using influences in both HMRC and LBG.We all know who it was & his links to the East End.Later this year Whyte & others will stand trial for fraud. It has to be hoped that SDM has to take the stand and 'tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.' I don't believe for one minute he was duped.I want to know just how whyte got Rangers and if SDM was forced to sell,by whom & for what reasons. Much later when HMRC finally admit defeat in the EBT case we may get the truth about that too.SDM for one owes us that by pursuing HMRC to establish the origins behind this so riddled with holes it cannot even win its own internal tribunals.

He & many,many others are going to look rather stupid if/when Whyte gets done for a fraudulent takeover. A club being the victim of a crime is punished ? Is that sporting integrity? Now Paul Murray is a director again he should be seeking discussions with the SPL club chairmen who took the decision to chuck Rangers out the SPL. On what basis did they reach their decision? Killie abstained if you recall. I suspect they took their decision based on the EBT tax nonsense. PM should endeavour to find out

I've no intention of watching it. Do I detect yahoo involvement?

LOL Jackson an expert is he ? The man who told us Whyte had wealth 'off the radar' was it? Presume this about Whyte is it? Our 'financial collapse' (not the terminolgy I'd use) was due to a takeover which will be proved fraudulent later this year whereby Whyte didnt have the funds to run the business he claimed to have and as a result didnt pay over PAYE/NI contributions from employees for a number of months until HMRC sought a winding up order. Very simple Keef. Any journo worth his salt would investigate how Whyte managed to acquire Rangers in the first place but that's beyond our Keef I think. Why not investigate if LBG blackmailed SDM into selling to Whyte ?And why & by whom? Or why HMRC let Whyte acquire Rangers when he already owed them £3m or £4m? Or why HMRC sought a fictitious EBT tax to deter reputable buyers acquiring Rangers from SDM meaning that the only buyer Rangers would get would be the likes of Whyte? Doesn't know Keef the answers to these ?

Not a problem - if they are good enough.