Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Posts posted by RANGERRAB

  1. I understand what I was given, just not the relevance of it. Show me the UEFA Articles that the SFA have disregarded and it will all be cleared up.

     

    The SFA are a national association under UEFA. They have not disregarded anything but introduced a ruling which flies in the face of what UEFA permit.Pozzo owns clubs in Italy, Spain & England but the SFA say Ashley cannot own clubs in England & Scotland.

    As someone on RM pointed out the SFA could now find themselves involved in a very costly legal dispute with Ashley which they are unlikely to win.How could they prevent anyone from acquiring shares in a plc ?

  2. I'm sure we all have always realised that, but we are just awainting the day when you realise that Graham, Dingwall, King etc are not our enemies.

     

    King will no longer be an enemy when he does something constructive like buyingshares.

    The other two are a couple of self-important blazer-chasers who get too much publicity for their own good

  3. George Taylor, Andy Ross, Barry Scott, George Letham and Paul Murray haven't mastered thin invisibility lark very well have they?

     

    Heard of Letham and Murray. How much was Murray investing?

    Was he getting it from Ticketus again ?

    Thought there was eight people. Who's the others?

  4. You will of course now provide a link to said articles.

     

    Giampaolo Pozzo owns Udinese, Watford & Grenada. What UEFA rules is he breaching?

    Why did the SFA introduce this ownership rule ? It makes no sense as there are examples of multi ownerships of clubs in Europe.

    I hope Ashley and Llambias take this the whole way.

  5. from the board perhaps but not from investing.

     

    that's not an issue.

     

    The SFA most certainly could block King if he's deemed 'not fit and proper' which following his SA tax affairs they would be more than entitled to do.It most certainly is an issue but if you would remove your DK-tinted specs you might start seeing things like this

  6. Rab, do you really believe that these people wish that? Of course they don't. We just want the club to be in the right hands, where money put in by whatever method goes to the club and not to line the pockets of Mike Ashley and his cronies.

     

    Well the people whom you call 'the right hands' never showed up when they were needed during admin/liquidation.

    I genuinely believe these people are loose cannons who are extremely dangerous given the amount of publicity they see to get

  7. GS if what your saying is true, if king doesn't invest or starts fannying about like so called investors then its pretty much guaranteed admin 2 and if it does happen then i can't see us ever being the top club in scotland ever again.

     

    I get slaughtered on here for saying King needs to buy shares. In view of this what other alternative is there for him to prove he genuinely wants Rangers ?

     

    ashley knew he would never be allowed to invest and was bluffing for publicity.

     

    Doubt that somehow. However I don't see Ashley accepting this

     

    it will be nearly impossible and will certainly take tens of millions and decades to overcome the damage greenco have done.

     

    admin may help but i sincerely doubt it.

     

    we had best hope that king hasn't been driven away and is now allowed to invest. I certainly see no viable alternatives.

     

    The only way he can invest is buying shares - something he refuses to do

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.