RANGERRAB

If the board do their job properly then they should advise the Herald(or whoever) that if any article is published which insinuates Rangers are a new club then legal action will follow

have personally lost all hope that king and the 3 bears will get anywhere.

The tactic of DK and T3b is simple.

Wait til things get to the stage where the board have to approach them then it will be their terms & conditions.

And just when you think things can't get any more mental, somebody goes and does something like this. Completely hatstand. Surely there must be Celtic fans cringing with embarrassment or pudding themselves laughing at this drivel?

Don't think so. I've yet to meet one who thinks we're the same club no matter how many times they get proved otherwise.

But it has to be our main aim. Any new board and/or manager better have the same goal.

Our first team squad is nowhere near good enough to win the Premiership. It will require quite significant investment to do that.

Despite the current dark shadow looming over Ibrox, I long for the day when we snatch "top tier" title No. 55 and display the number proudly at the stadium and any website that there is. Will probably be one of the sweetest moments in many a long day!

We're a long,long way from that day just now believe me.......

You have to wonder if LIEWELL stoked the fires for this at their AGM when this arose(for whatever reason) and he made his Rory Bremner joke.

Let's hope this comes back to haunt him.

Surely they are not going to surrender to their hate-driven supporters and call Rangers a new club? Now that would incur the wrath of Rhegan's SFA would it not??? Especially after Doncaster quite categorically stated last week Rangers aren't a new club

Another hilarious aspect to their drivel is ............

 

What NEW club starts life with a transfer ban?

And how did this new club manage to produce three years of audited accounts as it would have been required to do so to gain entry

I distinctly remember you hoping that Ashley won complete control. Shows you up for the fraud that you are.

I'd been led to believe he would invest in the first team squad.

Please retract your FRAUD statement

Must admit I wouldn't call Shiels a striker, more like someone who would play behind the strikers.That said I'd play him left MF instead of Steven Smith.

You dont need to MB - there is plenty of evidence to suggest there has been serious' date=' perhaps even gross negligence by this investigative body during the course of their enquiry into our club.

 

I hopefully manage to run a blog later today which attempts to provide some insight into this latest denial from them of information[/quote']

 

I've heard the same story and the same names several times about who were behind all of this. And not just from Rangers supporters too.

HMRC will prolong this as far as they can hoping they can win at some point in order to prevent all of this coming out. But they will not win and they know it

no idea but the fact remains that security cant be granted

FWIW I don't think Whyte has any claim whatsoever on Ibrox & Auchenhowie

they can't used those as security while whyte claims he owns them in court.

 

thats why they use assets bought after whyte.

Whyte? LOL. When's this due in court then?

LVG's best days as a manager are well behind him now. I thought ManU would have gone for someone younger

they will run out of money long before 7 weeks that's the next milestone.

Or get another loan from Ashley. Then another. And another.....

We'll end up like Newcastle who are literally in Ashley's pockets they owe him so much money

7 weeks. And there is still no call for an EGM so that will be 7 weeks +. They are only offering the 3 bears an olive branch with 1 olive on it their meaning is to keep control of the board. I can't see the optimism yet I am afraid.

Hopefully they'll come to their senses and realise they won't survive an EGM. The shareholder numbers is against them.The writing is on the wall for the board. They should do the honourable thing and go now

This mob don't give a shit so I believe they would dare. Ashely does not have 2 men on the board for nothing. they can in fact push anything through they want. With the help of the other board members of course.

They can only go on for so long whilst the shareholders numbers are stacked against them.

i would say so. it's just a matter damage they do out of spite now.

 

for example staff are still being made redundant as we speak.

Which staff?

they need the rights issue for their next move. they can't force that.

The game is up for them. Well and truly

soon the easdales wont be feeding him info that will help.

Or maybe Jack?

The position ashley is in with the SFA is a precarious one. I expect him to be found guilty throwing his position into doubt. dont think the bad guys expected McCoist to fail so badly either. chuck in goldy locks and the three bears all buying shares and all of a sudden whatever shady plans the had for Rangers have gone up in smoke.

 

they havent quite grasped the fact that the fans will not accept Ashley and co under any terms and still try to hang on for dear life.

 

They are in no position to bargain at the moment. They have nothing to offer. Judgement day will come when the SFA threaten to relieve us of the privilage to play football and take away our licence.

 

Are they though really that stupid that they will take things that far? I fear the answer to that question will be yes.

FWIW I don't see Ashley turning up for the SFA hearing on Jan27

gillivan hasnt had a thing right in years

You may well be correct but that's not his objective.

What he's doing is 'headline grabbing' where he puts out a story regardless of whether factually correct or not. His intention is to capture people's attention and hope enough will accept its validity often to suit their own agenda.

An example was the BTC and Rangers cheated using EBTs to get players they couldn't otherwise afford. That was and is still being peddled constantly despite the BTC being won & LNS declaring 'no sporting advantage'

One for the Audit Commission. The fact HMRC don't know how much they've spent on one of their highest profile cases is at least as significant as the total cost (assuming of course that it's true...).

I dont believe for one minute they dont know how much this has cost.Costs are not relevant unfortunately to those behind all of this.

It is all about trying to justify this HMRC pursuit of Rangers instigated by politicians from the dark side who sought to cause as much financial damage to Rangers as possible. Their problems began when WS returned as manager in 2007. The 9 in a row Rangers manager was back so they had to do something. And they did.

you oft quote his pish about dave king getting his money back.

I saw it in a document presented to the court by SARS.Could the document have been a fake?

HMRC will pursue this BTC right to the very end regardless of cost in order to try & prevent the true story coming out as to who instigated it. They need a victory somewhere in order to justify their actions but will not get it and they know it.

says the lad who quotes 3 names lies when it suits him.

And when did I quote Phil 3 names?