RANGERRAB
-
Posts
12,969 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Everything posted by RANGERRAB
-
Ten-year-old boy on Rangers bus hit by bottle thrown by rival fans
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Did Pacific Shelf 595 Fc issue any sort of statement on this incident? if not why not? I was also expecting some sort of condemnation by the likes of Nil by Mouth but maybe that is asking too much.They do seem to be very much a one-sided organisation do they not? A bit like FARE I hope wee Kieran makes a quick recovery & enjoys tomorrow as Rangers mascot but the cynic in me believes had this been a young Celt@c supporter who had been the victim things would have been rather different with the mhedia going into overdrive and the two Bob politicians who inhabit this country getting their anti-Rangers tuppence worth in too -
Ten-year-old boy on Rangers bus hit by bottle thrown by rival fans
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
They do look pretty traumatised to be honest. You'd be traumatised too if you had to stand next to that Geek holding that green'n' grey rag -
We've lacked a naturally left-sided MF/Winger for a long time now. Hope he does well.
-
He's working his notice. They certainly don't need to offer him anything. And won't
-
When WS was there and Ally took the team for domestic cup games he seemed to struggle more often than not. And WS had to intervene. Perhaps that was a sign of things to come
-
He's only caretaker though isn't he? But different from our caretaker manager though - He wants the job
-
I doubt very much if he'll waive it. It will likely be his first & last job in football management
-
Some sort of deal needs to be struck. It was reported after he'd resigned McCoist was looking for around a £300k pay-off.
-
They won't be back.
-
All a new board can do is negotiate a pay off. They've resigned and are under no obligation to take them back if ythey don't want to
-
couldnt agree more
-
LOL. Do you think they'd have accepted 'a more realistic salary' ? They're lining their pockets before they go (as they're entitled to do)
-
I don't think the board had the balls to get rid off McCoist and his staff. I think they were hoping he'd get us back to the top division and then leave voluntarily as a hero for taking us back up there. It hasn't worked out though has it?
-
We can't afford to hire a new manager(and his staff too presumably) whilst the present incumbents still drawing their lucrative salaries whilst working their notices
-
We don't/didn't have the money to pay them off due to the onerous contracts they are on. That's why McCoist is on gardening leave & McDowall is hanging around the dug-out
-
The contract was given to him by the previous board on oldco. It was TUPE'd over in 2012. Understand? With the benefit of hindsight the three amigos(Ally, McDowall & Durrant) should have been served their notice long ago. They weren't up to the task but the current board wrongly stuck by them probably in case it caused a backlash and the likes of Graham & Houstoun crawled out of the woodwork arranging more protests & boycotts
-
Acceptable manner ? There was no choice. We can't run Rangers on the consent of a caretaker manager working his notice who doesn't want to be there. Believe me, these players are much better than what we've got. To get promotion something drastic had to be done
-
You're missing the point(s). We would struggle to get promoted with the current squad & manager who doesn't want to be there. Something had to happen to give us a better chance of promotion.
-
The current board didn't give him his contract. It was TUPE'd over in 2012.It would have been Martin Bain probably
-
He'd be better doing that than football management that's for sure.
-
I'd be absolutely amazed if they weren't better than the unmotivated dross we've currently got most of whose contracts are up at the end of the season anyway
-
With better player players than the ones we've already got?
-
Not making a case for/against the board but they want us promoted back to top division. Every Rangers supporter should want that IMO. Don't you?
-
perhaps a vote of no confidence in the first team management as well?
-
The board are meddling in team matters because the football management are perceived to be failing in their primary objective i.e. getting Rangers promoted back to the top division. We can debate all day whether they're correct to do that or not