RANGERRAB

Nothing wrong with that but you know as well as I do that it doesn't matter what words are sung the usual pondlife in the Scottish Mhedia will do everything they can to use TBB to inflict whatever damage they can on Rangers & its support.

Anyone who votes SNP needs to know what they're voting for & the consequences of that. FWIW I think an independent Scotland would be catastrophic not least with its new currency & evaporating oil revenues. We should all(as Rangers supporters) be very concerned about what an independent Scotland would be like for us with a government with the likes of Roseanna Cunningham, Michael Mather, Brendan O'Hara etc in it

Which words would you change & why?

To begin with UEFA had no interest in censuring Rangers regards this song at the Villareal game. It's what(or rather who) made them change their mind we should be concerned about.

Then it needs to be challenged in court.

No just my opinion.

And what is the 'sectarian nature' exactly? F@nian is neither a religion or a race. Its meaning has been hijacked by the mhedia as part of their ongoing anti-Rangers agenda

Cameron was a buffoon who allowed the SNP to set he referendum question IIRC. The question should have been whether Scotland should have separated from the UK or not. If so I think the 55 percent would have been greater

Today's SNP is a left-wing republican party not unlike SInn Fein or Irish Republicanism. Past history is irrelevant. The SNP aim is independence and they don't care how they get it nor do they care what would happen post-independence. At the referendum last year they went around saying an independent Scotland would have currency union with rUK which was a blatant lie. To have that would have required the B of E to be an independent Scotland's central bank(lender of last resort). & there's no way Westminster would have allowed that. Not to mention all the other lies they spouted about EU membership, NATO membership, oil revenues etc. I was very proud to be a Rangers supporter who stood up as part of the 55percent who rejected this nonsense.

The yahoos will always support & sign up to the party in power in Scotland. Then they get themselves & their own into positions of power. That's why they've been 'signing up to the SNP in their droves' as you say

Hope this isn't true

I think this goes higher up than council level that turns a blind eye to the yahoos anti-British misdemeanours

It is up to the Rangers board to challenge this & make sure this doesn't happen isn't it?

Sectarianism is now an industry in Scotland which employs people & gives our excessive number of largely useless politicians something to do. And I've always considered the many individuals in this country who claim to be anti-sectarian to be sectarian themselves as soon as Rangers name gets mentioned

Going back to the OP - where are we now? In a damn sight better position than we were this time last year. HNY to all when it comes

This is something which needs to change.

How many SNP MPs are known Rangers supporters? Or MSPs? Or MEPs? Has the penny dropped yet?

F@nian is neither a race or religion

We need a striker first and foremost to replace Miller and Clark

Thought we needed a defensive midfielder?

Until it is acknowledged that other clubs have a problem too this will not go away regardless of which version of the TBB is sung. Indeed the yahoos have by far and away the biggest problem with their GB and IRA songbook.However whilst there is a SNP administration in place at the toytown Holyrood Parliament nothing will be done as the SNP draws much of its support these days from the yahoo fraternity

For as long as Celtc supporters seem able to sing IRA songs without fear of reprisal there will always be an element of our support who will continue to sing our so-called 'banned' songs

We should never ever underestimate the hatred the mere mention of Rangers seems to provoke amongst certain individuals & organisations in this cesspit of a country of ours. We should always be aware of this & respond in an appropriate,dignified manner when they spew their anti-Rangers bile & hatred

This is why we need a strong CEO/MD to confront these issues & see we don't get singled out whilst others don't.

I think we need to trust MW's judgement on this sort of player. We are looking at mainly English players outside their top division who perhaps in years gone by would have got an opportunity in that top division were it not for the fact what it has now become i.e. a billionaires cosmopolitan league. Players I've barely heard of are now going for £5m & £10m and we simply do not have that sort of money to pay for transfer fees let alone wages, bonuses & signing-on fees. My only comment on Forrester is that he seems to play in a position for which we're fairly well covered at the moment i.e. attacking MF