Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    12,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. But the board now get rid off them without paying compensation.
  2. It's obvious the Rangers board wanted rid off them and what has happened this week allowed them to do that without paying them any compensation.
  3. Poor journalism again by the looks of things.No quotes from anyone. Maybe they just the story from the usuals 'insiders' and 'sources'
  4. Could it be BDO think D&P sold off the assets far too cheaply hence this legal action against them ? £5.5m was it ? Always did seem ultra cheap to me. Wouldn't have bought half of Auchenhowie with that
  5. I thought HMRC refused to consider a CVA because of Whyte. Wouldn't matter who the administrators were
  6. I thought Green bought the shares from Whyte for £2
  7. who's got the shares MIH used to have?
  8. if Dom Ball's so good howcome he's on loan at Peteborough?
  9. It's not in administration.it's in a liquidation process
  10. Managers get judged by results. Unless ours improve MW will be going. I hope it doesn't come to that but that's the way things go in football
  11. If BDO are successful with his, added to the CB money that's over £50m in oldco accounts. If HMRC lose EBT case could oldco liquidation get reveresed ? And who would own oldco if Whyte is convicted of fraud? MIH doesn't exist anymore so who? Who would get MIH's 83p.c shareholding?
  12. Things coming together quite nicely by the looks of things. Not long to go now
  13. Why give a 37 year old striker with just 6 league goals a new contract?
  14. Playing 4 at the back with any sitting MF player in the SPFL is pointless when teams come to ibrox & park the bus
  15. We have no choice until we can bring in a CB with more pace. We either continue as we are not scoring enough goals or try going with 2 up front & change the formation. The status quo not an option unfortunately.
  16. Well play hodson then. We need to play 2 up front. We are not scoring enough goals with our 4-3-2-1(4-3-3). That means changing to 3-5-2 or 4-4-2. I'd prefer 3-5-2 because we need 5 in MF.
  17. 3-5-2 becomes 5-3-2 defensively though. We played against he yahoos with this formation on hogmanay & I thought it worked reasonably well. We need to try something. We are not scoring nearly enough goals hence why I hink we need 2 up front. The problem with 4-4-2 is that, as McCoist found out by playing this, the opposition can put 5 in there and you're a man short in MF
  18. Reading Davies comments, I can't help wondering if maybe we need to start playing 2 up front i.e. Garner & Miller possibly. Watching the game on Saturday I'm not convinced Garner is suited to playing on his own up front. As Davies says he's good in the air & on saturday he was winning headers & knocking them on to no one. He needs someone alongside him. He was getting too isolated on saturday for my liking. That would mean changing our 4-3-2-1(4-3-3) formation to either 4-4-2 or,as I'd suggest, 3-5-2 with Wallace & Tavernier playing wide in the 5. Thoughts ?
  19. I thought both MW & DW were under contract til 2019 i.e. Another 2 seasons It was total madness giving out new contracts to management & players until they proved they could cut it in the top division
  20. Clearly offside but the linesman isnt in line to give it
  21. You could be even more ruthless and say that Hill is the only one we've still got who has been a success from that list & he's 38 years old and unlkely to be here next season
  22. Handing MW & DW and various players new improved contracts before we'd even kicked a ball back in the top division was utter madness too.
  23. Miller needs to go. 6 league goals so far is not good enough. He is not a true goal scorer & his record since he returned in summer 2014 is not great.
  24. Spot on. The simple truth is we're nowhere near good enough up front. There were plenty decent deliveries into the box but no takers as usual. That said the forward positions need looked at. Garner is toiling & for the life of me I cannot see the board agreeing to a new deal for 37 year old kenny miller who has just 6 league goals this season.And Waghorn has always seemed to me to be more of a wide player rather than a central striker/forward. At the end of the season here's no doubt in my mind we'll try to move Garner out to avoid outstanding payments on his transfer.The big question is who to bring in. I got slaughtered on here at the start of he season for suggesting we go for Jason Cummings. I genuinely believe had we gone for him( and hibz were prepared to sell) he'd be well into double figures in the league by now.He signed a new contract with hibz in the summer but I'd be amazed if there weren't get-out clauses in it. He is one of the options I still believe we should be considering
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.