Am I understanding this correctly ?
A yahoo( presumably) sent an email to Dunfermline about the BTC, wasn't satisfied with the reply and duly went to the SFA who then contacted Dunfermline on the yahoo's behalf to presumably ask the same question again with, no doubt, lots of add-ons from the original question (because that's the way yahoos work)
Should we be asking what it was the SFA askedDunfermline ?
And on whose behalf ?
If allegations are being made should the SFA not bring them out into the open ?
I genuinely wonder about the conduct of the SFA in all of this.