RANGERRAB

Bit unfair to Hodson I think.

MW only signed him as back-up to Tav who's best RB in SPFL premiership In my opinion.

Like it or not I think Murty has decided Hardie isn't good enough.

Only time will tell if he's right or not

Genuinely can't see us getting Tyler Roberts. 

Is is he better than Morelos?

30 minutes ago, boabie said:

Over the years I've met Ally a few times and always thought he was a pleasant, decent human being and a good Rangers supporter.

Now I think I'd cross the road to avoid him. 

If Ashley is ever in Ibrox again I won't be back ever.

Ashley has never been in Ibrox as far as I know. I doubt he ever will be so I wouldn't worry about it

On 19 January 2018 at 16:45, pete said:

Mike Ashely does not know what genuinely means. You are crazy if you think he would do it for the club, Aa leopard doesn't change it's spots and his history should tell you what he would do to the club.

If Ashley, or anyone, turned up at the front door at Ibrox and could genuinely prove they wanted to put serious money into Rangers then they would not be turned away because we're being kept going by directors loans at present which is not sustainable.

As for Ashley, as I said earlier, it ain't happening. He's getting out of football.

On 19 January 2018 at 11:08, chilledbear said:

You want Ashley involved at Rangers?

YES - If he wished to invest & could prove he genuinely wanted the best for the club. 

But it ain't happening. Read my post again.

I actually don't think McCoist is wrong but there is not a cat in hells chance of Ashley investing in Rangers or any club. He is getting out of football altogether 

Legislation brought at the request of the yahoos to get big bad Rangers.

However the yahoos started to get snared by this legislation and so they now want it repealed.

A classic case of unleashing a tiger which turns to maul you

I often wonder what type of individual is attracted to a club whose support openly hate the country they play in. 

And whose support seem to be above the law as we witness all too often when we play them. Why is this & who condones it ?

I neither trust nor like them. I suspect there are many like myself who think this way too.

What are the constraints which make Pittodrie unsuitable for internationals ? Anyone know?

10 minutes ago, JFK-1 said:

Four.

How come we got 5 from Newcastle 3 years ago? ( albeit 4 were injured)

Good to see we're getting players in but I do expect(or hope) a few will depart as well

Is it only betting companies who want to sponsor Scottish football ??

On 14 January 2018 at 13:14, colinstein said:

if we sing it at Uefa games we'll be sanctioned as we have been before. At other games as long as you miss out the offending line I can't see how it can be banned

Maybe we'll just get a slap on the wrist like Celtic do every season. UEFA are a joke of an organisation

On 14 January 2018 at 12:54, StuGers said:

Completely agree. It is very strange how the term “h*n”, given it’s obvious source from NI, is constantly argued as non-sectarian, whilst fenian, which is terms for this Irish Brotherhood who were multi-faith, is termed sectarian.

It is not strange or difficult to understand at all. Since Holyrood was set up & when you look at those now in charge it is self-explanatory.

They hate us & favour them because they'll get more votes from them. And to get those votes they produce anti-Rangers legislation.

Cardoso's problem is that it looks like Murty doesn't rate him

I'm always sceptical about friendlies but beating the Brazilian champions 4-2 will do us no harm at all. Only the Scottish mhedia won't like it though

I'd take Naismith back in a minute if I thought he was half the player who left in 2012. Sadly I don't think he is though.

5,000 UK companies used EBT's. Let's see how many of them HMRC go after. I've long suspected it was a rogue element within HMRC which pursued Rangers.

Lord a Hodge is not a tax expert. Both tax tribunals(lower tier & upper tier) found in Rangers favour but when this went to common law courts they found otherwise as the judges probably didn't understand tax law and took public opinion into account as well.

It will be interesting to see how this develops. 

The most bizarre loan deal ever. Azerbaijan ??? WTF

Cheap shot about Rangers? Well I never...

But.....but.....ra Shellik wur tired.

Brenda said so.

It will be harder to get rid off some of these players than we think. For example:-

1) Are we prepared to write off millions of pounds of transfer fees paid for these players & if so how much are we prepared to write off ?

2) what about players returning from loans? Do we want these players back?

3) Who would want any of these players & would they be prepared to pay the exorbitant wages we're no doubt paying them?

I'd suggest we'll need to offload around half a dozen players first before we get anyone in. I repeat, I don't think that is going to be easy

Happy new Year to all Gernetters

It was a rhetorical question, Rab. McLaughlin makes me feel physically ill whenever I see his deformed fizzog.

The recruitment policy at BBC Scotland's sports dept has been evident for a few years now. Candidates from a non-Rangers background or anti-Rangers background will get preference.

And their broadcasts don't hide it either.

Why is an Irish rugby fan Scottish football's chief BBC correspondent?

Is the answer not rather obvious ? Same for Chris 'bicycle helmet head' McLaughlin, Jum Spence, Cosgrove, Cowan, etc, etc