Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    12,969
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Posts posted by RANGERRAB

  1. On 16 March 2018 at 13:54, MacK1950 said:

    Maybe somebody within Ladbrokes or the judging panel has a sense of humour.

    LOL that made me laugh.......are you serious ??? 

     

    Windass thoroughly deserves this award. He has been magificent this season as his goals & assists record proves. And he is only going to get better. 

     

    I can't remember when I last saw such an improvement in a player in such a short space of time asWindass from last season til now. Long may it continue.

  2. A five game ban is nowhere near enough for this vile excuse for a human being.

     

    He behaves as he does because he knows he can get away with it here in Scotland. He has friends in the right places including the SFA who treat him leniently when these incidents occur which is far too often.

     

    In England he wouldn't get away with it. The English FA would then hammer him so hard no club would employ him.

     

    When he left the yahoos in 2014 he probably expected a premiership job but no club was interested in him. Not difficult to understand why. The only club he got was Bolton who were under a transfer embargo at the time. And he didn't last long there before they got rid off him.

     

    As for the KIllie game in question I thought the referee was perfectly entitled to award a penalty. The ball was heading towards goal & hit the defenders arm. 

     

  3. The London stadium is totally unsuitable for for football. Many West Ham fans were opposed to the move but their board went there presumably because of its bigger capacity than Upton Park.

     

    It cost something like £270m to convert it into a football stadium of which West Ham paid very little towards. And British Athletics have something like a fifty year lease so modifications are difficult as the running track would have to remain.

     

    Spurs originally looked at moving in but want to demolish it & rebuild. That was refused so they re-developed White Hart Lane. Wise move I'd say

  4. Regards the OP yes Morelos didn't perhaps do too well today in terms of chances missed.

     

    But for me a bigger concern is the no of goals we're conceding especially at home. 

  5. On 6 March 2018 at 16:40, Germinal said:

    While others more than played their part, it was HMRC which devastated our club.

     

    Good luck getting information out of that body.

     

     

    HMRC's role throughout has to be questioned. No doubt about that & whether there was a rogue anti-Rangers element at work within HMRC. And I genuinely believe that their 'victory' at the SC has presented them with a major problem now they will have to pursue all other EBT's. Do they have the resources to do this ? Perhaps it would have better suited HMRC to lose at the SC.

     

    But don't forget about LBG. Rangers bank debt was just 3 p.c of the MIH debt butt LBG pressurised SDM to sell Rangers. You have to question their motives behind this. And maybe who was behind this & I don't believe it was the lackey Shanks at Whyte's trial.

     

     

     

     

  6. If QPR rate Sean Goss so highly why don't they play him more often in their first team ? He's been there over a year now & seems to be finding opportunities limited.

     

    Goss is 23 later this year & needs first team football. He should get himself a good agent to get himself out of QPR to somewhere where he'll get first team football. Preferably Rangers.  

  7. On 27 February 2018 at 21:52, boabie said:

    Another great performance and result for us. Well done our guys.

    Another diabolical performance from yet another cheat of a referee. It's gone way beyond a joke now.

    I don't see how he could possibly give the St Johnstone player just a yellow for the kick at Bates. He has clearly seen the incident so it cannot be anything other than a straight red.

    And Morelos first half goal should have stood or a penalty awarded for Shaughnessy holding Bates

  8. The SFA need to throw the book at Lennon. He is attempting to exert influence on referees which is unacceptable. He is also undermining hem.

     

    He cannot be allowed to get away with this like he did while he was yahoos manager.

     

    And what does Petrie make of yesterday given his SFA role ? Does he think Lennon's conduct was acceptable ? Or was it over-exuberance to use a previous quotation of his ?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.