Blue Moon

However it turns out the guilty must be punished whether it means more turmoil and uncertainty for us or not. We deserve to know the truth. We will survive whatever comes. The last year has proved that.

And they can't bribe us to hand it over for our membership.

That is no bad thing.

No-one seems to know. They are better at keeping stum than we are.

Well, this will put the cat among the pigeons. It will be interesting to see what the cabal's next move is.

In that case it is very disingenuous of them. Not good.

Did anyone at the club say he was suspended?

It is a bit obvious isn't it? Hope Green sticks to his guns and tells them to shove beside the transfer embargo. That has to be rescinded before any return to the SPL.

Saw this on Twitter too. What a beautiful sentiment. In Scotland they call it defiance!

Gribz, what makes you think we would be in the 2nd 12?

Exactly. Answers please, Mr Doncaster.

Cannot argue with that.

Strikes me that they don't want it to succeed and will cut the SFL off after establishing SPL2. This is going to get nasty.

Tough on the boy. I wish him all the best.

That was truly awful We deserved nothing from the game. We are less fit than part timers which is disgraceful. Our passing and set pieces are woeful. We don't close teams down and we can't find space. Today exposed Hutton. No pace, dreadful passing, no closing down. We deserve better.

Some of Cribari's defending has been breathtakingly bad today.

Gibbons is one of the obsessed and I do not mean he is a Celtic man because I don't know, I only know he is anti Rangers. The day after Scotland get all-round humiliated he finds nothing better to write about than Charles Green. When the big inquest happens into the demise of Scottish football, guys like him will carry a lot of the blame for allowing the real culprits off Scot free and failing to investigate the real story. Instead they pander to the baying wolves.

While I would agree that he didn't give us anything, I wouldn't agree that he didn't try. What he did or didn't do on the park has got nothing to do with the morality of prank phone calls that have a distressing impact on peoples' lives. You are not the only one who gets angry.

He didn't slag the club or supporters off. He was taken in by a prankster. Did anyone ever think he was there because he loves the Rangers? He will likely lose his job and will have to relocate his family and if he has kids they will have to change schools and learn another language. This is a sad story and my anger is not with Sandaza (despite the fact it hasn't worked out on the park with him), but with Tommy who gets away Scot free with causing upheaval to a family's life. What is his motivation? I hope he is happy with himself tonight.

What a superb article by John outlining the inconsistencies in this law and in the logic of the Celtic minded lawyers etc. It is not surprising this is where we are at but we need to ram this message home again and again. This is all about equality but there are people in this country in positions of power who are abusing their powers to ensure there is no equality for us. Having said that, this is a dreadful law that needs to be repealed as a matter of principle on the grounds of free speech, not simply because it is now being applied to them. The stench of hypocrisy is overwhelming in this little country of ours where it is okay to be anti English but not be pro the union. This is indeed a political fight.

You are absolutely right, Amms, the present set up isn't working but asking the clubs to give up their control over youngsters requires a level of altruism that doesn't exist in football.

The situation we find ourselves in is not an acceptable one. I would prefer the CEO to be working behind the scenes to deal with this, not through statements on the website or in the press which only pave the way for loudmouth Chairmen and fans in a repeat of last seasons sporting integrity fiasco.

I am not a fan of this type of so called humour. It is ok for some harmless fun but this is done with malicious intent and will have consequences for Sandaza. There should be some protection for people in the law against these sorts of things. Phone tapping is only allowed under special circumstances and this strikes me as being a similar sort of thing. It is yet again another example of abuse of modern technology that the law needs to catch up with. Don't get me wrong, I am all for freedom of the press, freedom of speech and association etc but this impinges on Sandaza's freedom. For what it's worth, I agree with GS, he could have said a lot worse and in some ways it has backfired. Unlike David Murray Sandaza has been duped.

The media, SPL, SFL, in fact everyone has been very quiet about this.

A fair and measured statement. Obviously written for him