Jump to content

 

 

Blue Moon

  • Posts

    2,622
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Blue Moon

  1. I don't think there is a chance of that. The one league structure gives them control of our TV money while leaving us to go back up through the leagues. How the rest of the teams cannot see this is Lawell's agenda at work is mystifying. Can people really be that stupid?
  2. Superb, John. You have put into words what made me so angry listening to that podcast today.
  3. It is high time the cabal was exposed and the people who are working Doncaster from behind were named. If Gilmour is alluding to people who are acting in a responsible way, then not everyone is part of the cabal. It is time they backed the man. What are these Heads of Terms? Why the urgency? Why the persistent lying? Yet again bullying and lying is being ignored at the very top of Scottish football. Where is Vincent Lunny now? A chairman is threatening legal action for slander but we all know it will be ignored? What kind of message does this send out? Would you sponsor this bunch of reprobates? Where are the massive headlines demanding the truth, the interviews with fans asking for their opinions and the call for action against the bullies?
  4. I've felt a bit sorry this year for Little stuck out on the right but his fight and commitment to the team is to be admired. I think there is a lot more to come from him if we play him up front and provide the ammo. I voted for him as player of the year and Lewis McLeod as young player of the year.
  5. This has made me laugh. The guy is a crackpot. It will give the obsessed something to see.
  6. I hope these chairmen will be consulting their boards, shareholders and fans.
  7. There are agendas going on that no-one understands. It is disgraceful that the media have handled this in this way. It is time for the truth.
  8. I agree with Frankie about this article. It is good to see factually accurate reporting with analysis minus the hysteria of the red tops and the radio programmes. DB has a very valid point about the lack of coverage of the SFA and SPL. It is time these guys were grilled, put under pressure and forced to resign. I, however, think it is unfair to make that point in relation to this article by Richard Wilson.
  9. To get back on track. I am hopeless with these legal/financial things. Can someone tell me succinctly what this means for CW and if there are any implications in this verdict for any former or current officials of the club?
  10. I will reserve judgement on Murray until I know for sure to what extent, if any, he was pressurised into selling by Lloyds. Whyte to me did the damage. Of that there is no doubt.
  11. Thanks, GS. Was away for the weekend and missed this.
  12. What is this AJ accusation? Can you explain please?
  13. I realize that, but it is pretty chilling to see it all in one place.
  14. What is that all about? Recorded in September and aired now? Charlie Green shouldn't have said it, it is not exactly the conduct of a CEO. That aside, is this a banned song? If it isn't, it is time to make a stand. I don't sing these songs but on grounds of equality and freedom of speech, it is time to speak out against this ludicrous law. This is the sort of issue that could unite fans behind Green. McCulloch may have done us a favour.
  15. Someone is feeding Jackson. Could it be his pal Traynor? Where is Traynor in the midst of this meltdown?
  16. As a small, teenage girl I used to stand on the beer cans to see the game.
  17. In terms of the SFA and HMRC, if not criminally guilty by allowing it to happen, they are certainly morally guilty. In terms of HMRC, they would not usually wait so long before coming the heavy with a company not paying tax. IIRC the SFA knew in Nov. I and many others have always thought we were given enough rope to hang ourselves.
  18. James Traynor and Keith Jackson told the SFA. They both said it on a radio Scotland podcast.
  19. To be fair to John, he was the first of the internet bloggers to criticize McCoist and I have agreed so far with almost everything he has written. This sends a message to me that opinions are changing, as I was getting the impression that it didn't matter what green did he wouldn't be criticized by people with a voice. Notice that RST have asked for people's concerns today. STB, I have remained absolutely and honestly open minded about Green until the last few days and been skeptical of GS, FS and others who I thought had a bit of an agenda against anyone that wasn't of their choosing. I think you need to get your head out of the sand. It mystifies me that you will harangue McCoist for his shortcomings (and rightly so to some extent) but that you continually make excuses for Green. I have been quick in the past to accuse the press of being unfair and persecuting Rangers. In this instance, thank God for Peter Smith. He is doing the job of a good investigative journalist without favour or prejudice. I am on no bandwagon. We need to know the whole truth, no matter how unpalatable that may be.
  20. Actually, criticism of Leggo aside, I was asking myself today why Spiers is still pushing his old article on Charles Green and racism when the story has moved on so much. He really is a professional disaster.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.