Jump to content

 

 

Anchorman

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,407

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Anchorman

  1. Anchorman
    I must admit I wouldn't cast David Murray as "evil".
  2. Anchorman
    Yes, Warnock is looking too comfortable sitting there and not for the first time.
  3. Anchorman
    I will be extremely disappointed if our in fighting forces this man to walk away.
  4. Anchorman
    Does anyone have a link to Irvine's response? Where was it aired?
  5. Anchorman
    Reading the thread again and I can only see one poster who seems to be anywhere near negative towards McColl i.e. Trueblue64. Am I missing something?
  6. Anchorman
    What you clearly don't get from my post is that I get that too. I never once said we need his money. You've obviously read my post as me being anti-McColl or a cynic, so you clearly haven't read my previous posts on the subject. I am all for McColl. I was quoting what he said about not investing personally. The bit I didn't get was him saying he couldn't invest, which Gunslinger cleared up for me. Likewise, I think it is hugely telling that McColl spoke out today as I stated earlier in the thread.
  7. Anchorman
    Why do you think that? I was so hoping it would be, and I haven't changed my mind about him, but it fell a bit flat for me.
  8. Anchorman
    Nothing you didn't already know. He will not be putting any money of his own in as "he has an obligation to his own investors to protect their money." I don't get that though. So he has no personal wealth? He welcomes Dave King's involvement. This is his last interview.
  9. Anchorman
    It certainly is. And if it is JM then it makes a refreshing change for him not to have any qualms about his allegiance aired on a public forum. Gives me a helluva lot more confidence in his staying power this time around.
  10. Anchorman
    Good article IMHO
  11. Anchorman
    I was one of the "it's a pie in the sky idea" crowd, but that has made me think twice.
  12. Anchorman
    Just appeared that way because of the craft and flamboyancy that was on show round about him.
  13. Anchorman
    If we keep playing like this it could come in the shape of Raith Rovers. Woeful!
  14. Anchorman
    Oh well, that means long balls to Daly for a while yet! I suppose that is the tactic to play on an artificial surface, whereas it is 'ball on the deck' on a bad surface. No wait a minute...............
  15. Anchorman
    What's Ally thinking of bringing on a player with guile and craft (Temps). Is that not a bit risky?
  16. Anchorman
    How many frickin long high balls are we going to punt up from the halfway line FFS!!!
  17. Anchorman
    I disagree
  18. Anchorman
    I would agree with bitchy (and antagonising just for the sake of it) which was why I refused to get involved in a 'debate' with you on a previous thread. As for "twisting the facts", read the OP again. No facts twisted. If you disagree then fine. As before - we can agree to disagree.
  19. Anchorman
    Vote registered
  20. Anchorman
    You are over analyzing what I'm asking. I'm not talking that low level. Basically how does out team prefer to play the game - high front line, four at the back, five at the back, lone striker, two strikers, wingers, player in the hole behind the strikers, sitting midfielder (s)??? It doesn't take a TV panel of professionals to see that surely if you watch your team regularly?
  21. Anchorman
    It is very prevalent at the moment, especially in away games. I actually saw us deploying this tactic a couple of weeks ago against a gale force wind and I couldn't believe my eyes.
  22. Anchorman
    I keep asking but no one has answered yet - what is our football philosophy at the moment i.e. what formation to Rangers prefer to play at the current time? I honestly don't know. I'm talking as basic as that. Leaving aside youth development, big money signings, the Barcelona\Dortmund\Ajax way. Stick to what is happening right here and now with the management team and the players available. Can someone please tell me what our preferred strategy\formation is - 'cos I don't honestly know?
  23. Anchorman
    As a matter of interest - how would you describe the system or formation that Rangers play at the moment? Every team has a preferred system - what's ours in your view? Are we really saying, as was suggested earlier, that it changes game on game? That is bloody scary if we are.
  24. Anchorman
    So it's all a cunning plan then?
  25. Anchorman
    In response to the points above: (1) That is my point really. Had we been in the top flight that argument would have been fully justified, but in the lower tiers? Really? Are we honestly saying that we are in danger of losing ground against the sides we are currently playing against by adapting our style of play. I would argue that the players we have would see us through that. (2) Why not - if you get it right? Within reason of course. There has to be an element of flexibility. (3) Yes - I would say so. This is not a cheap shot at McCoist. It's a genuine belief that we will rue this wasted opportunity in years to come. It's the first time in all my years following Rangers that I can honestly say I don't know what our preferred formation\style of play is.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.