Jump to content

 

 

Anchorman

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,407

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Anchorman

  1. Anchorman
    What is that supposed to mean??? Lighten up buddy. McGregor challenges him. Green takes up the challenge and 'puts bells on' by nominating Lawell, and all the while charity is the winner. What have we supposed to have fallen for as Chuck pours freezing water over his napper?
  2. Anchorman
    You've got to hand it to him - he doesn't hide does he, or do things in half measures. Peter Lawell?
  3. Anchorman
    I would say the Glasgow Cup was miles more prestigious back in the day. For the simple reason - you had to beat them to win it. I remember going to a full house against them on a few occasions in the GC.
  4. Anchorman
    When did he become his best mate? I know who McCoist keeps company with and Hateley has not been in that company (unless very recently) that I know of.
  5. Anchorman
    I'll bet he doesn't see it that way.
  6. Anchorman
    You are not only the most repetetive guy I've ever encountered, but your comment comes across as very simplistic\naive every time you print it. It doesn't warrant a response any more.
  7. Anchorman
    Oh well - that's me sold. Lets hear it for the board!!!!
  8. Anchorman
    I find changing peoples names silly and immature. Like if I called you Der Binliner or Der Berlend that would be silly.
  9. Anchorman
    Talk sense and I will always agree with you
  10. Anchorman
    Yes you do go to some lenghts at times. I think you will find a hint of sarcasm in your own comments to me, but I will leave it there. People are already bored with this no doubt.
  11. Anchorman
    Anyway, as I was saying, has he agreed to the move or is it being engineered by the board?
  12. Anchorman
    (1) What has King done wrong exactly? You have literally no idea what he is doing behind the scenes (nor have I(. You have made a story up in your head. (2) I'm not a diehard follower, and I totally disagree (3) Irrelevant to the point being raised. I will repeat - I don't care what anyone calls him, but don't play 'neutral' if you do start using silly names. It gives you away.
  13. Anchorman
    This and the fact that his involvement with youth football at home was a major reason for "never wanting to leave" last time. Being forced?
  14. Anchorman
    I would try to cut a better deal with them. "Call it £800,010 and you can have our manager too".
  15. Anchorman
    As long as you do
  16. Anchorman
    I don't give two hoots what you call him, whether you have taken his name in your wee referee's book, or whether he is on that long list of dignitaries that you have chewed the fat with. You could call him Puss 'n Boots for all I care. It wasn't 'offensive to my sensibilities' in the slightest. My point was purely that it was an indication of your lack of respect for King and an indication of your unbalanced view on the matter accordingly.
  17. Anchorman
    Don't pretend that you are then, which you frequently do. Why don't you just call him his name like a grown man.
  18. Anchorman
    It is lovely how you come to his aid so quickly - very noble - but what complete tosh. So it is appropriate to use a silly name for Dave King because of what we've been through? You've lost me with that one.
  19. Anchorman
    Irrelevant what anyone else calls him. I'm highlighting your obvious lack of balance on the subject i.e. anti-King, pro-board all the way.
  20. Anchorman
    Silly little comment highlights your lack of balanced thinking on the subject.
  21. Anchorman
    I agree with the just of your comments, but I can't see it being as soon as Sept\Oct as this desperate bunch don't care too much for dignity or the better good of the Club. I can see them hanging on until the place is crumbling round about them.
  22. Anchorman
    Remember that it's 'empty barrels that make the most noise'.
  23. Anchorman
    I don't give two hoots about any 'faction' of Rangers' support. I'm from an age before internet when a Rangers Man was a Rangers Man, and none of this stupid faction nonsense existed. I've no grudge to bear with these guys whatsoever. But credit for what exactly? If they have something to say then say it, instead of this farcical "coming up in the next episode folks we uncover.........". If what they say deserves credit then I will be first in line to hand it out, but I've seen nothing that deserves credit yet. Nobody "leads the way" from what I am watching.
  24. Anchorman
    "VB will provide evidence that the punishment was handed down unfairly or perhaps even illegally". For me the answer is already in the wording. Perhaps illegally? If it wasn't illegal then it is no story. Just another 'that's wasn't fair', but lets see what they come up with. I may be pleasantly surprised.
  25. Anchorman
    I admire your optimism I wish I shared it. Accessing unauthorised records is instant dismissal. Leaking information about authorised or unauthorised would be prosecution I would bet. Either way I think it would have been leaked and we would have heard. Why would HMRC not issue a statement to that affect - "we have dealt with the individual concerned and he\she no longer works for our department"?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.