-
Posts
311 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by trueblue 64
-
And to think you had a pop at me for quoting wiki. I thought you were way smarter than this.
-
Doors will probably be chapped, horse's heads will probably be left. Sos aim 3 - to keep the club off the front pages Oh the fucking irony.
- 48 replies
-
He is not correct about Paul Murray investing 250k in Rangers and I doubt he's correct about Whyte still being involved.
- 52 replies
-
- rfc
- rangers fans
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
Rangers Board 0 - 1 Requisitioners (Court of Session)
trueblue 64 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2377761/Supporters-mystified-by-Rangers-youth-plan.html It was a dodgy scheme that Murray was a part of, if profits had been made, dividends would have been paid. -
Rangers Board 0 - 1 Requisitioners (Court of Session)
trueblue 64 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
In addition to the first team, Rangers F.C. also have a reserve team and an under-20 side. On 20 April 2004, Rangers Football Club announced the creation of a new company which would oversee the development of the club's youth players. The company, called Rangers Youth Development Limited, is entirely self-funding but completely owned by the club. It attracted four investors from outside Rangers who have invested £1 million, with the club also putting up an initial £2.5 million. This would leave Rangers F.C. in an unfamiliar position which would mean it has to buy its own youth players from Rangers Youth Development. The company will own the young players and the club will need to bid for them although it will have first option on all the players. If both sides cannot reach an agreement on a transfer fee then a FIFA transfer model will be used. Any profit made by the company will be divided between investors with the majority being invested to fund more youth players. [2] The main reasons for the formation of the new company is to offset the running costs of Murray Park. However, many of the Rangers fans were opposed to the formation of the[3] According to this Murray was to receive dividends from our youngsters.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C._Reserve_and_Youth_squads. -
Rangers Board 0 - 1 Requisitioners (Court of Session)
trueblue 64 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
King has money to spunk, Murray does not. Paul Murray has INVESTED NOTHING in Rangers. Show me where King has backed Murray's campaign. -
Rangers Board 0 - 1 Requisitioners (Court of Session)
trueblue 64 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
I am over the moon at the thought of King coming back unlike a lot on here who were sceptical last week until the papers started suggesting King was pro Murray. -
Rangers Board 0 - 1 Requisitioners (Court of Session)
trueblue 64 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
What I said was'nt spin, it is fact, Ask Fury. -
Rangers Board 0 - 1 Requisitioners (Court of Session)
trueblue 64 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
The point is he did not invest in Rangers, he invested in a make money from Rangers scheme. The fact that he made no profit says a lot about his lack of business acumen. -
Rangers Board 0 - 1 Requisitioners (Court of Session)
trueblue 64 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Is it not true that Paul Murray put 250k into Rangers Youth Development along with Ian Hart, not into Rangers directly. In fact did he not stand to make a profit from selling us our own youngsters. Hart appears to have got his cash back in kind, maybe Murray feels he is due his. -
Tycoon Dave King set to return to Rangers as chairman
trueblue 64 replied to Steve1872's topic in Rangers Chat
The Easdales can stay as they have put cash in, but Mather who has put a million in can't. What cash have the people put forward by McColl put in, heehaw. King will put in a substantial sum, he will demand a substantial say and he will demand strict financial governance. Welcome home Dave.- 64 replies
-
- smith
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
This would be even more reason to rubbish it.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
So King is happy at being used as a pawn in a PR stunt.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
If this was a PR stunt by the board King would have rubbished it by now.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
Covered in post 46.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
If you are against something and are actively campaining against it you ARE a rebel. It is a more accurate term to describe the requesitioners as than the term SPIVS is to describe the current board .- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
Hardly an earth shaking surprise. The question is, though, will he be a major player at part of the current set up, or a major player under a new board? That's the unknown. King has already stated he will not purchase existing shares so I see him coming in via a second share issue. The amount of power he would control would depend on the amount he put in, this in turn would determine the make up of the future board. I think the existing shareholders need to be asked would you allow your shares to be diluted by X if King and possibly others put Y in.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
Paul Murray has stated he would gladly walk away if King came in. King has not stated if he is for or against the current board, if he is against them then yes he would be a rebel.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
I would love King to come in and get rid of the lot of them and I include both sides. Some people just seem more concerned that King may back one side over the other. Away to work, will be on later.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
You are still focussing on our current destructive issues. Do you think Dave King could improve our club is the question.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
It seems a lot of people on here would rather we stayed on the current destructive path rather than even consider that this could be good for our club.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mather & Stockbridge meet Dave King in South Africa
trueblue 64 replied to MeAndMyWeePalJoe's topic in Rangers Chat
I believe King will be our next owner/major shareholder, I stated this several weeks ago.- 80 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
I appreciate the link Zappa, but I did not appreciate the if you're actually interested jibe.
- 22 replies
-
- rfc
- rangers fc
- (and 4 more)
-
Could you let us know if they take a vote of members who hold shares in their block, which way to vote at the AGM. Afterall we would not want them to lose their democratic right to vote.
- 22 replies
-
- rfc
- rangers fc
- (and 4 more)
-
Surely not, that would be underhand, unbeffiting and snide. CF is also illegal facts/lies and often used by the rebels in an underhand, unbeffiting and snide manner.