Jump to content

 

 

trueblue 64

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    311

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by trueblue 64

  1. trueblue 64
    Will pitchforks and "sack the board" banners be issued at this demo, or do people need to bring their own?
  2. trueblue 64
    I too have decided to be nice about all Rangers fans in order to play my part. I can't promise to be nice about republican Jim as he's a Partick Thistle fan. This is where this problem starts and then gets escalated.
  3. trueblue 64
    Leggat published a blog last week which if true could have proved catastrophic, even fatal for our great club AND he had the fucking cheek to tag an advert for his new book onto it in this manner. SHAMELESS.
  4. trueblue 64
    We certainly have the players capable of winning the SC this season, but do we have a manager with the tactical nous. His previous record suggests we don't, but me being an optomist will back him to turn this around. Has any non top league side ever won a major national cup or could it be another historical first for the Rangers.
  5. trueblue 64
    Are the RST going to publish a list of the supporters who hold shares in their block and have they taken a vote to determine which way to vote at the AGM.
  6. trueblue 64
    That may well be the reason , he wants back on the gravytrain.
  7. trueblue 64
    Is that PM's 250K, the RST's 250K or is it your's to gain entry to the AGM.
  8. trueblue 64
    Why did the rebels and indeed the fans not demand to know the name of every shareholder back at the IPO before they invested.
  9. trueblue 64
    It seems the rebels are required by law to provide these details and the board are not. Are the rebels trying to change company law? Investors are entitled to annonimity unless they are trying to affect change to the company.
  10. trueblue 64
    He will be asking to see the deeds next
  11. trueblue 64
    Charles said NO SURRENDER or we would be minus quite a few titles.
  12. trueblue 64
    So you are saying Green accepted it and Ally overuled him. And here was me thinking Green was Ally's boss..
  13. trueblue 64
    It sounds like he had budgeted more than 45M to pay off SARS and still be in a position to take control of us. He seems to believe he has got off lightly, which can only be good for us. I like the plan of strict financial governance till we get back where we belong.
  14. trueblue 64
    Seems we both missed this. Dave King thread post 43.
  15. trueblue 64
    Seems I'm not the only one who missed this. Todays thread Herald Q & A with Mather. Post 18. Apologies for not c&p or link, new android tablet that seems to need the fingers of a supermodel to operate.
  16. trueblue 64
    Still news to me,don't read the rags. I read both RM and here most days, missed that one. Is there a bit missing, because it says he gives them a breakdown of where it's went which I can't see. Or is it just another pile of shite reporting.
  17. trueblue 64
    News to me, please enlighten.
  18. trueblue 64
    We don't KNOW, we have been told they have spent all the cash by people determined to drive down the share price
  19. trueblue 64
    Percieved incompetence by the current board has driven down the share price. The accounts will make things clearer.
  20. trueblue 64
    The share price has been driven down intentionaly by McCollco. He has made it clear he won't invest himself, so who is he driving the share price down for. Only one anwer to me, King, no matter what they say in public. Dave king has chosen now to voluntarily settle with SARS because the end game has begun.
  21. trueblue 64
    IMO King will be the next owner. The end game has begun.
  22. trueblue 64
    JM wanted certain changes, the board accepted some of these but were told no compromise, sounds like a dictator to me. Since when did 25% become greater than 75, bring on the vote I say. Contributing to Scotland/uk, you hit the nail on the head with THEIR taxes. Plenty foreign companies employ people in the UK, it does not give them the right to dictate who governs us. You seem to have an unhealthy obsession with the nether regions.
  23. trueblue 64
    A mans political beliefs are his own business right up to the minute he choses to discuss them in public, that's why ballot boxes are sealed and voting booths have partitions.
  24. trueblue 64
    I stated previously he was a non contributer so he did not have the right to dictate, same goes for PM. JM should stay out of the independance debate as well as he probably does not contribute to the country either. First it was bollocks, now it's sphincters, so much for pettiness.
  25. trueblue 64
    Apologies for the terminology used, what else do you call someone who states. They came from another country and took control, it's time to drive them out. How would Mr McColl feel if the people of Monaco referred to him in the same manner. As for his political leanings being relevant, I don't want to see an independence seeking Scottish Nationalist ex pat controlling the direction of our club
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.