Dragosani

Do we know who the other three are?

have they tried asking their agent?

I often wonder what Sutton would do for a living if he didn’t have Rangers to talk about. No doubt he would have a lovely wee pub somewhere, where he could regal folks over their fried egg and chip dinners with stories of how he fell down for a living every Saturday afternoon.

...hmm, that article screams, lets wind up the Rangers fans a wee bit more and generate some his for his rag!

maybe someone should remind him that he also has a responsibility to Rangers first.

haven't seen warburtons interview, however the line regarding "We’ve got a responsibility to his parent club. We have got to look after their asset" is a shocking thing to say (from a Rangers perspective). Whats the point in having players come in loan if they cannot/or not allowed to play the full 90mins?. We're taking off our most dangerous player on the night and leaving on those who are pish to struggle on? sounds like her had given up the game.

Doesn't seem like he's been given a fair chance to prove himself! He needs a decent run in the team!

I'm suggesting that both of them have had a past, that can be seen as be questionable. However King gets the chance to right those wrongs (with a second stint with us) but Barton doesn't. That's what i find annoying. PS. I've got nothing against King and i'm glad he is at the club but the handling of this is an utter shambles! all we've done is just given our adversaries more scope to take the piss out of us and sell their newspapers!

Its a good point about a different board. However you could argue that with our majority shareholders problems in the past with the south African tax bodies and the millions of pounds, paid in settlements/penalties to them that our moral stance is a bit tenuous?

This is indeed shambolic. Its embarrassing for the fans, the players & the club. The fact our board cant see this is pathetic. it wouldn't surprise me if we offered to release him and he's declined on the grounds of !fighting for his place. and now the board are hoping our beloved SFA (the champions of truth & justice) will find him guilty! Then we can take the moral high ground and fire him. This whole situation stinks!

whats ian Andrews doing these days?

I'd like to see him back. I don't like the idea of Brown and co sitting smugly thinking they have got the better of a Rangers Player. Also, I think he can still do a job for us.

Interesting! just one supporter? it sounds like maybe someone is taking one for the team?

The old "inviting him to leave" plan!

Plus the media will have a field day with this. They'll do their best to spin this out and try and destabilise us!

Banned 3 three weeks from the training ground as well. So how is he supposed to train (and keep fit) then IF indeed he is to come back.?

..or possibly there is someone else in the mix?

which is shame. we could be paying over the odds (wages wise) for someone whose equivalent (in Belgium/Croatia etc) could be younger and hungrier to succeed!

I've often thought that myself. Why aren't we having a wee look at the Belgium or Croatian leagues! There's normally gems tobe found there!

No doubt he's hoping to start a bit of aggro, thus he can then have a moan about the big bad rangers supporters giving him abuse! Mind you, maybe somebody should say He's irrelevant to Scottish Football

so what action does he face then if he doesn't turn up? What punishment do you get for contempt of parliament?

didn't lan Ferguson take over in one game?

"he expressed his dismay in an email exchange"... Then its simple, all he needs to do is show the Rangers board the emails and or his editor. Then the nasty stories will all go away!

Just sitting at work here and I nearly spat my tea over the keyboard with that mental image!

so they will be relying on Agency staff?? oh well! That means they have to spend more money on hiring someone else to do his work! who knows maybe we'll get a balanced report