Dragosani

Not watching the game,. Are they targeting tav or just lobbing balls over our defence?

It baffles me why our recent managers always seem to stick to the Plan A scenario, no matter what. Surely being a good manager is recognising when something is not working and changing it. Is this a pride thing and they are unable to see the wood for the trees? Or are we a basket case and they are looking to self sabotage in order to get sacked? If 4-2-3-1 isn't working, then try 442, 532 or 5212. When teams have worked out how to get under our skin, then we need to change the record.

The comments on Facebook are not good for Clement Someone pointed out that Aberdeen got a new manager new players and new style of play in the summer and yet here we are a year later with, new players and no stle of play.

I don't think I've refreshed a page as much as this one, just waiting for (any) news.

Looks like he's been sacked from Sunderland (well according to twitter).

Curious, are these Clement'a choices or players identified by scouting team.

Just voted for Clement 😁

Maybe like me, they can't decide. We need an either option.

Oi you lot!! I've got this thread on constantly , and when I seen 25 new responses, I thought this was it!! Please no more antipodeans puns!! 😁

.... Or testing the water to see if the fans were up for lampard project.

Why would they go for the guy that's won he-haw. Clement and muscat have at least won leagues!!

The thing we should be looking at is the character of the next manager. We need someone, who can motivate and is not afraid to drop people. I must admit, I doubted Gerrard, was excited when we got GVB and then Beale. Both had been around the block a few times, had learnt from different managers, different countries etc. However after listening to them, watching their tactics (and lack of plan b) , have now become more jaded with it all. My feeling is that while it would be good to have a Clement/gallardo, is worry about things being lost in translation. So for me, .. I'm leaning towards Muscat,.

Got to say outside of Celtic we should really play with two forwards. Teams, will pack the defence and crowd, that one guy out. If we insist on one forward he needs to be the complete package. Hold it, turn it, strike it he needs to and be supported with two fast/strong wingers/inside forwards. I'm getting the feeling that the players are either not understanding what Beale wants, or they are(and following his plan, to the letter) and the rest of Scottish football can see it a mile coming. Now a good coach/manager, will know when that happens, it's time to react and change/try something new. If they can't and just hope, that some how plan "A" will work, they are in the wrong job

I was on the fence for a while. A couple of reasons being, it's early in the season, and worried that we would be seen (as someone said above) that we would be seen as a poisoned chalice. Which I suspect is why some people voted no. Personally I voted in the end for him to go. Watching the Kilmarnock/Celtic games, I couldn't see any style or cutting edge. Either the players are not listening to him, or he can't communicate his ideas to them. He's also left yilmaz out of the Europa squad, let hagi (cantwell injury)go out on loan to. Listening to heart on hand podcast, I have to agree with some points. He was backed by the board. These are the players he wanted. They were brought in to play a certain formation/style. This hasn't happened. Danilo is left on the bench. All bizarre.

The problem is, it creates a vacuum, where people will fill it there conjecture. Then from the players point of view, there is potential for them to become disheartened/down tools because they know he'll soon be out the door.