-
Posts
1,321 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
0 NeutralLocation
-
Location
Larbert
Interests
-
Interests
Rangers, rugby, hillwalking and rock music
Occupation
-
Occupation
I work for a bank
Favourite Rangers Player
-
Favourite Rangers Player
Brian Laudrup / Davie Cooper
-
Twitter
@Mark_S_Crawford
-
Mountain Bear started following New management team: Mark Warburton and David Weir , Ban from the Scottish cup , Confirmed: Law, Temps and Clark to leave and 3 others
-
Bluebear54's GPL 2016/17: Kilmarnock v Rangers
Mountain Bear replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
Killie 0:1 Rangers FGS Kranjcar -
It is. Only really works where there's high demand for a game though, for obvious reasons.
-
That's how the re-ticketing scheme works, if you can't make a specific game, you tell the club in advance and they re-sell the seat. You get a discount towards your next season ticket and everyone wins.
-
Don't disagree TB. Just a question of how many. There are almost always spare seats in the corners of the Clubdeck even on busy nights and if we genuinely do sell out regularly, then the club can adjust the incentives around secondary ticketing to make it more attractive - that's a real win / win / win for ST holders, occasional fans and the Club.
-
Cashflow - money up front is better for the club than a drip feed from individual games. Plus, it means that they're guaranteed to sell the tickets for end of season games which might end up being meaningless.
-
The word "lie" is being used pretty liberally around this subject. If a club employee did say Club1872 was the Club's idea (and if you say so, that's good enough for me RBR), that still doesn't mean it isn't (or couldn't be) independent. It might simply mean that the Club encouraged discussions as it preferred to deal with a single fans group, which would be quite understandable. Certainly doesn't amount to evidence of lying. I've seen similar on Twitter this week regarding Lionbrand - accusations about lying, based on a lack of clarity over the exact route by which the money raised gets to the Club. I'm sure there are some valid issues being raised and that mistakes have been made, but I'm equally sure that some folk (not you RBR) are looking for any excuse to put the boot in and ensure Club1872 fails. Fresh elections can't come soon enough IMHO.
-
Release #10 certainly ticked the right boxes for me - informative & reassuringly thorough.
-
I wouldn't be unhappy to see him stay for another season, but if we need to free wages for areas where we really need to strengthen (CF / CB), then so be it.
-
I think the main outcome of strict liability would be opposition fans with their ears glued to the radio / TV, desperately trying to hear things to be offended by.
-
Agreed. Unfortunately, Saturday's events have given the Scot Gov an excuse to defend the hugely flawed 2012 Act.