BlueMazza

I imagine a lot of those who sign up are young and think it's a) a good job and b) something they can do. Once reality bites, it must hit quite hard.

The whole point though is it's obvious the attendances are down because we are no longer there.

Oh the irony! Anyway, I agree, tis a bit annoying when threads are constantly derailed.

Anyway, I think this is great. Perfect solution all round. I'm sure the moaning masses will have an opinion shortly, once they've been told what that should be

It's easy to sit and judge. I imagine it's pretty fucking scary knowing where you are about to go and what might happen, I wouldn't judge anyone who did it personally.

I completely missed Reid's 'back of the bus' analogy. How fucking dare he? What an absolute disgrace. Easy to see where Kearney got his comparison idea from. Nice to see some truth written out.

I don't think it not being Adidas is a bad thing myself but I suppose everyone has their own preferred brands. I just feel that with the 3-stripes it seems to reduce the options with the shirts.

I mean advertised on the shirts. As far as I'm aware we don't do that.

I appreciate the 'money will useful' line but surely not everything has to have a price! Or do we end up with each player sponsored by a different company. IS any company acceptable? Would you want provident for example, as long as the money is right? We should tread carefully imo and not give away club decisions.

We should follow on a Celtic tactic and announce we are full every match, or even just make up numbers, see how quickly it's picked up on Personally I think this story shows the media bias more than anything else. This shows the media are willing to print whatever Celtic tell them. If they are this dodgy over the attendance figures, what else are they hiding? But why even do it? It's easy to find out the truth. How many of the reduced fans are using the free tickets Celtic offered? Or the reduced hospitality tickets on groupon or it's equivalent. This is a fairly large story in fairness. The income difference from ticket sales against their pie in the sky figures will surely show the truth.

The SFA yet again deciding whether we are the same club or not, as and when it suits them.

Fair play to Strachan then, although he's not one to appease people against his own train of thought. I would hate for us as a support to be against ANY of our players playing for their national team, whichever team it is. It's a personal decision, not ours to make.

I can see DU coming out with 'Well we were against a boycott in the first place, if Rangers had accepted their allocation as they should have, none of this would have happened.' Blame sidestepped in one easy motion. Something we HAVE to ensure doesn't happen. I sincerely hope nothing happens at the game

Ah the timing....

Genuine question - is that right? Or is it a guideline? If anything, DU should be charged if there is any trouble, for failing to manage ticket sales & seating appropriately. All to make a quick buck.

Awesome!

the DU quote also mentioned they were happy with the 'redistribution of wealth'. I have a feeling DU will become the No.2 club cash wise, until such time as we are in top flight.

How exactly does he line us up? I agree on some of the other blogs he written but not on this one. It's gossip/rumour without trying to claim it's fact.

Previous instances didn't include the bottom part where he mentions about reacting properly. It's also the internet, people write a lot of shite on the internet. People like Alex Tomo get PAID to write shite on the internet. It could be libel, but he doesn't say 100% it is them. Just that he received an email with two names, could they be the names he was looking for?

It's not a slip, it's a wee sly dig and also crafted to ensure maximum reaction from the drooling idiots who live off this shit. With no old firm derbies to castigate as Scotland's Shame, the mhedia have to whip Rangers/Celtic fans into a frenzy against each other so they can sell more news.

It is not leggo's responsibility. He is not responsible for the actions of others and he clearly states he does not support any untoward action. If people cannot react to this news without threatening harm/violence on others then they need to go and get some professional help.

Fair play to this one and I say that because at the bottom he adds how we should react. To be honest, I don't buy or read it anyway, it's been anti-rangers for ages.

Yes because everything in the world is so simple and so black and white.

Utter shite from Leggat there. Calling the guy a coward, a donkey etc? We either support the Armed Forces or we don't. If the Armed Forces wish us to tone it down, we tone it down. No need for this vitriolic shite. Leggat should be ashamed of himself.

Surprise surprise. Bunch of wankers. Ignored the views of the PAYING masses, you know us who pay to watch the game. Most people wanted a different set up, but hey clearly those with a vote have shown they are in it for themselves only.