Jump to content

 

 

Crimson Dynamo

  • Posts

    1,566
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Crimson Dynamo

  1. Perhaps, they are in with Artemis or are representing other investors. But to not have at least 1 share in your own name seems odd to me. I may be wrong I'm not sure how this part of the financial world works
  2. So if what McMurdo says is true - then Murray, Blin and McColl don't have a share between them or did I read it wrong?
  3. But he'll more than likely follow it up with a Rangers site and maybe even a newspaper. All with the same message "give the Easdales a chance" Then eventually in a few weeks we'll get an interview with the Easdales in a tabloid For the spin to work all or most of the above need to be singing from the same sheet. It doesn't work if they are still getting attacked from all sides when they give the interview
  4. He went to Scotzine to promote the current board, he will have known Scotzine's stance on Rangers. But in giving the interview to Scotzine it gives Scotzine something they crave "mainstream credibility" now we are all talking about Scotzine. In return perhaps Media House offered an exclusive or an interview in the hope they will give them more favorable reporting on the board in the future all part of the spin in my view
  5. We don't need anyone else at the moment we have more than enough to win League 1 and probably the Championship as well.
  6. From what I can understand D&P classed all the prize money as an asset and sold it to Green to claim from the SPL who saw matters differently and kept it. Had D&P not done this then it would have been classed as the Oldco's money and would have gone to the creditors. I suppose the the real question is was it an asset or not? - I'd personally say no - but I'm not versed in such things
  7. Spin Spin Spin Actions speak louder than words
  8. Time/Date Price Volume Trade Value Type 10:31:32*30-Aug-2013 48.5 25,000 12,125.00 Ordinary Trade - delayed publication request 11:33:15*30-Aug-2013 50 25,358 12,679.00 Ordinary Trade - delayed publication request 08:15:40*30-Aug-2013 47 40,000 18,800.00 Ordinary Trade - delayed publication request Could these be the start of it?
  9. Did he give them £14m I wonder
  10. They're clearly trying to go on a charm offensive but failing miserably. People don't want spin anymore - We just want the truth
  11. Makes for interesting reading, shocked at some of the numbers, positive about some of the others. I am shocked though that on the face of it Rangers appear to be doing very little to stop these leaks.
  12. and that's why imo we shouldn't sign MIller we can't have people essentially hanging around picking up a wage.
  13. Shit haha!! My bad (((hangs head in shame)))
  14. I agree I think his signings have been good Law especially. I was impressed with Peralta in the Newcastle game and Daly looks like he will win everything that is pumped into him especially in League 2. I'd take Miller as well but only at the expense of someone like McCulloch.
  15. What a strange person to seek comment from
  16. I've still got a signed copy of his autobiography True Blue - A real Rangers Legend
  17. Pointless to sign him - we really need to get away from the short term-ism that seems to engulf us.
  18. We don't need anyone else - He should have more than enough to be getting on with.
  19. It's scary the amount of money we must've flushed away over the years - I'd hate to see any figures on it
  20. I agree the only way it would be worthwhile is if he would take a lump sump say 50%. Which would make sense in the long run. Do you know how long his contracts got? Presume a year...............
  21. I loved that goal - one of my favourite Rangers goals of all time! Wilkins looked stunned to have scored it, he looked in total shock but no bloody wonder it was a fantastic goal!
  22. You would hope that'd mean no more new signings though. Rangers either sells him/gets him to leave or pays him off. If they pay him off - no replacements should be brought in
  23. We need to get to a place where we are open and honest and fully accountable for our actions. All this spin from every side is becoming very tiresome
  24. It does, but ultimately they let Whyte in as did SDM. They failed the shareholders of the oldco. They must've known full well what was going to happen to Rangers Why not report Whyte? How did they miss the 7 year ban? They were supposed to do a forensic investigation into him - They could've killed the deal or at the very least make it difficult to go through
  25. According to the report published by the SFA on Rangers bringing the game into disrepute. Paul Murray was more than aware what Craig Whyte was, as were most of the board Martin Bain in particular. No one from that time should ever be allowed back on the Rangers board.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.