Jump to content

 

 

caseyjones

  • Posts

    1,159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by caseyjones

  1. Did I imagine it, or did he claim on Sunday that he spent time getting the backers together prior to bidding as opposed to others making a bid and scrambling around looking for finance? It could be the Murray/Whyte effect, but his story appears to be unravelling before our very eyes.
  2. The mighty Arbroath were put to the sword.
  3. Any new owner will not be choosing to go to Div.3 and nor will they be pulling out of the domestic cups.
  4. "@GersnetOnline: Interesting meeting at Ibrox earlier. I'm afraid Green was far from convincing & there wasn't enough time for any difficult questions." "@GersnetOnline: @JohnDCGow Plenty patter but little substance. This man has a long way to go before he can prove he's the right choice as new owner."
  5. Green confirmed '5 or 6' investors already with a pot currently 'over £20m' To confirm: Ticketus deal has been terminated. Now owe them money, not tickets."
  6. Shepherd and McDonald among 20 potential investors. Green: no chance of Rangers being kicked out of SPL because it would mean 5 or 6 others going bust. Green has met with Whyte three times. Documents have been signed; Whyte is now out of the picture whatever happens. Green: in 5 years time, RFC more financially secure than Celtic (and winning SPL consistently)
  7. No ST rises next season.
  8. Not quite. They can't hand out anything more than the maximum penalty for a charge.
  9. â??The Judicial Panel shall have the jurisdiction, subject to the terms of the Judicial Panel Protocol, to deal with any alleged infringement of any provision of these articles. â??Aâ?¦ clubâ?¦ if found to have infringed the articles shall be liable to censure or to a fine or to a suspension or to an expulsion from the Challenge Cup [scottish Cup] Competition, to any combination of these penalties or such other penalty, condition or sanction as the Judicial Panel considers appropriate, including such other sanctions as are contained within the Judicial Panel Protocol, in order to deal justly with the case in question.â?
  10. Outrage doesn't change the rules that were agreed on unanimously by the clubs.
  11. 95, and not 94.1 is the relevant part.
  12. Existing players are omitted from the sanctions.
  13. The Judicial Panel have unlimited powers, something our wonderful administrators should understand.
  14. His three-year contract entitles him to the terms of the contract, unless he chooses to re-negotiate. If the club terminate the contract, they will be liable to pay compensation.
  15. Silence is never good. What are D&P up to behind the scenes?
  16. He's not talking pish, he's just not telling the whole story.
  17. It would have been clear if he had stated that he was going nowhere, whatever happens.
  18. He's got a contract with a release clause in it - of that I'm certain.
  19. I was positive that he would be gone this summer. That interview only confirmed it for me.
  20. He won't have gone by then. Any player who chose to trigger a release would recoup any monies they gave up, and then some.
  21. The clauses were put in there for a reason, and it certainly wasn't one which benefitted Rangers.
  22. This time next year, Rodney,.....
  23. It was intended to be light-hearted banter.
  24. Insolvency Consultant 2012 - coming soon from GA Sports!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.