Ergatrude

Shagger is apparently signing for Besiktas.

Can't have someone else disciplining the Rangers now can we? They might not be harsh enough.

I thought Edu said last week he had no intentions of leaving. I also thought Healy had already left?

Or Dylan (lick)-MaGooch.

I've never hated any Rangers players. Worst signing (IMO): Michael Ball, signed for £6m (?) on high wages & spent most of the time injured. Wasn't he tipped as Englands best LB? Fucking useless & injury prone.

Players who turned up: Kirk Broadfoot, Lee McCulloch, Lee Wallace, Neil Alexander, Scott Gallacher, Kyle Hutton, Ross Perry, Kai Naismith, Darren Cole and Kane Hemmings, Andrew Mitchell, Salim Kerkar and Chris Hegarty. The last three players on this list are currently out of contract. Due back on Monday: Dorin Goian, Alejandro Bedoya, Maurice Edu and Carlos Bocanegra.

£80m? I thought the Sky deal was £110m? Or have they knocked £30m off because they know something we don't?

To Charles Green - it's worth a fast buck. Double his money & move on. To Rangers - it's worth more than a lifetime of trophies. So the entity that owned our club has changed, these times will test some fans support. But we still exist & are in a better state, financially, since before I was born. To Walter & co - it's a chance to run the business in a manner that will not be of detriment to the club & what happens on the park. We will become a dominant force again, make no mistake about that. How long it takes may test our resolve, but it will happen. Time to flush out the negativity & look positively to our future, however hard that may seem. The future's bright..

Because any consortium led by or involving any 'Rangers Family' who went on to liquidate the old company would have tarred their reputation &/or business ventures past & present with a "you killed The Rangers" tag. Also, there would only ever be a select few who would be willing to spend the money on legal fees & such to vett whether the newco route would be an achievable one. No consortium, without proper consultation that I would imagine wouldn't be cheap, could be certain that what CG & co have done would have been achievable. Now that the dirty work is done, a new bidder can come in & buy a fresh company, no debts, no tax case, no season ticket deal & press forward with what needs to be done to have a sustainable & successful club.

Now we wont be paying back any loans or other commitments such as Ticketus so we should be able to at least break even now. I'm sure a few high earners will leave too.

I think Sweden shouldn't be written off in group D. They never lost a qualifying game. Fair enough France & England are favourite, but if Sweden bring their A-game then they are definite contenders to qualify.

To be fair.. I'd probably let Super Ally bang my missus & hope I ended up raising a secret love-child that would go on to become a Rangers legend. :fish:

Copy & paste from Twitter.

He got wrecked & left a message on his gaffer's answer machine of him singing GSTQ.

Probably got sacked for celebrating her Majesty's Jubilee.

I think we would miss him. He is a decent player, has periods of inconsistency & periods of being solid. He was arguably our best midfielder this season & wasn't far behind Davis in 2010 Most importantly he is always 100% fit & with a small squad that is of paramount importance, IMO ofc.

He has ability.. but it's overshadowed by the fact he's a thug. His tackles are horrendous & dangerous. No thanks from me.

Full number 01332387203

I cancelled mine to switch to VM when I moved house. I put my reason as "a passionate Rangers fan who will not support those financially who chose to fund organisations that chose to act against my club without fairness". Yes, I was drunk when I wrote it & no its not the real reason. I've received a call at least once a day from a number that begins 0133, is this a sky number. I'll paste the number in a minute or two once I copy it trim my recent calls.

Black should have had 2 yellow cards, Griffiths should have seen red.. Kujabi should have seen yellow AT MOST (for the shirt tug), it was never a penalty.

IMO, a newco is a fresh entity therefore can not have broken any rules or regulation. How can you punish a company that has broken no rules?

Does that video actually show the can being thrown? I didn't see it.

What legal action could they take really? Uefa ignored swiss courts, surely the sfa could do the same?

Livingston have written to the Scottish Football Association warning they may take legal action if the governing body fails to act upon Rangers' financial woes appropriately. STV understands the First Division club have outlined they would pursue up to £1.2m in lost revenue for their relegation to the Third Division in 2009 if the SPL side are not dealt with in a similar manner. The decision to demote Livingston, who were in administration but in the hands of prospective buyers, was made by the Scottish Football League prior to the start of the 2009/10 season. A failed appeal to the SFL was followed up by a submission to the Scottish FA, who ruled the punishment was fair and reasonable. The governing bodyâ??s judicial protocol was given a complete overhaul last year and insolvent clubs, as well as any appeals processes, are now handled in a different manner. Nonetheless, Livingston believe a precedent was set in the judgement and have now stated they are monitoring how the Scottish FA are handling the Rangers situation, as uncertainty over the future of the club continues. If prospective buyer Charles Green is unable to strike a deal with creditors to take the club forward via a CVA, it is possible the businessman will pursue a â??newcoâ?? route to ensure the club continues as part of a new company. The move, which would be unprecedented in Scottish football, would require Scottish FA approval to go through if the new company wished to inherit Rangersâ?? membership of the body and could be subject to further sanctions. Rangers have already been punished by both the Scottish Premier League and Scottish FA for being in administration, with the latter recently administering a 12-month registration embargo and fines reaching £160,000. Rangersâ?? appeal against the Scottish FAâ??s sanctions, which were described as to have â??struck a balance which was relevant to the mischief and proportionate to the breachâ? will be held on Wednesday. The independent panel set up to consider the initial case against the club stated in their deliberations that "only match fixing in its various forms might be a more serious breachâ? than Rangersâ?? failure to pay tax contributions for employees, amongst other discrepancies. Termination of Rangersâ?? membership to play football in Scotland was also considered at the time, something which was ruled to be â??too severeâ? a punishment. Both the Scottish FA and Livingston declined to comment on the letter.

I though Brookside was cancelled?