the gunslinger

the player if his buy out clause is met.

I doubt d&p want looked at to closely.

I would throw 50 at the gers no problem from 92.

bitchslapped into submission.

repayment terms are vastly different certainly.

bitch slapped and they know it.

I can't see the difference except the repayment terms.

good statement that.

yes mate. get mine on the way home.

no of course not.

I wound open a pet shop as well.

with 92 bar you could do both.

I will be. if I win I'm going to put mark dingwall on the board out of badness.

good let's get this all over with asap.

god forlanssister you make me look cheery.

whyte and grier seem to disagree.

it seems to me d&p agree this should be quick simple and cheep. so why isn't it. we could be in Europe next year if it was. if fees had been kept to 500k then a buyer would with the jela money only have had to bid a few million to get us to the numbers proposed today.

if green fails its d&p we need to question not green.

I've told you before no need to appolgise to me. I make the odd mistake myself.

bk definately said he was paying d&p and funding the club seperate to the 5 million. of course the kicker could be the lawyers fees or any number of things. bk will know if he feels he's been wronged its up to him to day so. I doubt he will unless the cva fails.

case to be heard alongside whyte v BBC and king v sdm.

pretty sure any creditor can challenge it so we must be due pretty much everything.

actually a lot of us are creditors and are due answers.

these ones perhaps yes. perhaps d&p have shafted him. he looks the spiteful sort.

I do agree that it would be simpler just to bid more and not pay the defecit etc. I am not at all sure why they are doing that. perhaps we don't know enough to evaluate properly.