Jump to content

 

 

Bears

  • Posts

    2,050
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bears

  1. Yip, may be you could look at it as him actually being a good thing in the end, no the way he treated and used us, but the fact he sort of stabilised the club again and got us into the hands of people we can trust?
  2. I think this is big, the biggest and best news we have heard since this kicked off. Would they really jeopardise their careers if they didn't think this was true? Is there a White Knight? This news gave me a pretty swift erection if i'm honest
  3. That's the first time i've seen PM make a direct quote he wants to buy us. Good news
  4. I did say Gersnet on my Rangers page, but almost put RM haha
  5. Del here's link to my page. I've quoted you and linked this thread https://www.facebook.com/Ibetwecanget1000000people.that.love.the.Rangers/posts/336635576383350?notif_t=feed_comment
  6. Cheers for the spell correction. I normally hate them but that was actually needed I read the delay opposite to you, but i'd never really read it the way you put it and that does make a lot of sense. Do you mind if i post this reply on my FB page i'll make sure and quite you and Rangers Media
  7. I'm with you on this train of thought too
  8. I've posted this on my FB page Ive been thinking about this all day. The people that we have to trust and have got to be trustworthy are the administrators rite? Well, as far as i've read they have said the likelihood of liquidation is unlikely, possible, but unlikely or have i read it wrong?? I know other clubs fans are "experts" on administration and liquidation and everything else around our club, and Rangers fans are believing them, why? Why would the administration team tell lies? it is not productive and it will look bad on them if they've said we're not likely to go into liquidation, they will have people watching them from with in their profession and if we do liquidize it looks bad on them. I honestly don;t think they would sugar coat this subject. If we were gonna be liquidised they would have said something along the lines of"Rangers fans need to prepare themselves for liquidation, it's a big probability" If anyone else has read it different from me, i'd love you to point out anything wrong in what i've said. (i mean that nicely not in the snidey way it looks as i am very open to be educated on this matter)
  9. There's a real simple way around this. Don't sing it.
  10. I understand what he's saying through out the article. The way i've picked up the liquidation issue is it's not likely to happen, because the admin guys have said so. Surely they wouldn't lie?
  11. http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottish-premier/rangers/299754-dunfermline-have-problems-with-new-rangers-spl-entry/
  12. Am i not right in saying most of the TV money comes into the SPL from abroad. I pay roughly £45 for my sports package in Thailand.
  13. I've been mulling over starting in the 3rd div. I think it would be great fun as we went back up the leagues, but i think it'd do long term damage to the already bad state of the SPL and in the long run and would cripple the SPL beyond repair even after we got back in. We're cutting off our nose to spike our face. I'm sure other poster will give a good argument against that which i would gladly listen to and accept if it looks viable. Just like when someone said to me when i said i'd struggle to support a "New Rangers" if we started with zero history, they said,"The New Rangers would still be the same product that "four men had a dream of" as with out their vision the new Rangers would not be about. But i'm still not sure i could but that argument is a great point
  14. Yes. Despise grief tourists and fake grief
  15. Good read mate. I never realised you were "that" Danny on twitter I RT you too
  16. I can imagine. I've not, and won't say much about potential new owner(s) until they offically own us and show us their plans. I will say i'm a tad uncomfortable with this "Save Rangers" thing as i don't feel it sends out the right message. There's a lot of Bears think this money has already been pledged and we should be using it
  17. We've been bitten once by already with a new owner. I'm pretty sure the admin guys are going through any new potential owners with a microscope
  18. Crap post, bull shit rumour. Sorry. Admin can delete this if they want
  19. My guess they'll be very heavy handed. It'll cause a bit of bother and be heavily discussed online. Rangers, the cops and fan representatives will have a meeting with the cops and it'll calm down. There is an easy way round this though. Don;t sings songs or use words that are deemed "offensive" It's not very difficult
  20. We aren't all clued up about this stuff though mate.
  21. I couldn't support another club like i do Rangers as we know it. I've thought long and hard about this.
  22. Del i don't know how this works, it's information from guys like you that will influence me. But if we start from scratch as a brand new team with no history, then i'm afraid i'm gonna find it hard to support them. But if it's as simple as you make it out to be then i'll still be here
  23. In a nut shell, yes. I've been thinking about this for weeks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.