Jump to content

 

 

Bears

  • Posts

    2,050
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bears

  1. I wish Dingwall would remove himself from anything to do with Rangers as IMO he's a huge reason why we can't get harmony between the fans. Anytime i see his name mentioned it's negative, plus he totally contradicts what the administrators say. D+Surely they will not have disclosed who the other prospective buyers are? As for him to say,"It's the blue knights or liquidation" means he's been shown the financial clout, or lack of it of the other UK and Global interested parties. I thunk he's a stone cold liar and is using the BK to get himself in the boardroom. As of now the BK can whistle as far as i personally am concerned. There' far too many alarm bels ringing, especially the one with the bright red light above it warning me about Dingwalls ego
  2. Ok thanks mate. Still, why would we do business with them when they've proved to be incompetent already with mega millions
  3. This suggests to me Tickitus borrowed all the money they gave to CW. major alarm bells are ringing now http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06788788
  4. You can do it already http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Awhg_8nWwok
  5. He's a crank and does us more harm than good
  6. The Blue Knight have shot themselves in the foot with this tickitus involvement. I know we should wait and see what happens, but surely they must know that alarm bells are ringing in a lot of bears heads
  7. I totally blanked any Tim crap since this started, in fact i rarely read anything to do with them, period. I know Lennon is the manager, Lawell owns them or summit like that and Scott brown plays for them. that's it. I block and unfollow Bears on twitter that RT them a lot. But because i'm human and a total utter hypocrite i've been seeking out the "nucleartimplosion" that happened yesterday, and love it!!!!
  8. Bears

    Save Rangers

    I agree with dave King. My hope is there's someone we have not heard of yet, with cash and a great transparent track record in business gonna buy us then bring fans on board
  9. Bears

    Save Rangers

    That's fine mate, but you know what i'm saying, there's too much mistrust going about. We can't afford to take any risks, and won't
  10. Bears

    Save Rangers

    This is the problem with MD. Guys like me here so many stories, none positive. I've no doubt he's a Bear, but all i read is he rips off Bears with out blinking an eyebrow. If one or two said that i'd brush it off, but over the last year, since i joined twitter it's nothing but "do not trust this man" Since we've been fucked over by CW, my honest opinion is this guy wants to step away from anything to do with any group of fans being involved with a takeover consortium as there's too much mistrust in the Rangers support now towards any new owners, or those involved
  11. Bears

    Save Rangers

    I'll hold my hands up and say i don;t know much about him, but i've yet to read anything positive about him, so instinct tells me if he was totally removed from the equation then we might get more harmony between the fans. Craig Whyte's a "Rangers man" too by all accounts.
  12. Bears

    Save Rangers

    Who you talking about mate? Dingwall?
  13. Bears

    Save Rangers

    But you have the 2 degrees of separation from the internet (my guess) Everyone will know what's being said online by proxy. I think the internet is pretty much engrained in football now and even if someone is not even online at home, someone will tell them what's being said i think.
  14. Bears

    Save Rangers

    It seems to me that there's one name that crops up all the time, Mark Dingwall and if he was to step back then there might be a lot more harmony between the fans?
  15. Bears

    Save Rangers

    We'll never have solidarity as fans no matter how hard or loud we shout for it online.
  16. Totally agree. If we do get a new owner with in 8 week, it depends on who. There's huge alarm bells ringing with the Tickitus involvement. It's like we took 5 steps forwards yesterday then immediately took 3 back. We're not really in a position to be choosey, but they need to be very open in what they can offer the club in the way of financing new players and giving the current batch of players that took wage reductions their normal wage back. I have alarm bels ringing like many do, and the fact that the Blue Knights have happily taken Tickitus onboard spends alarm bells ringing with them and all involved as well. But, i'll wait and see what they have to say first before making my mind up 100%
  17. It makes sense. A guy on my FB page had come up with a pretty valid scenario. Do you think the day after CW is officially "kicked out" of Rangers then the result of the TC will appear?
  18. That's what i was trying to say in the post above you mate. We've played our part in one way or another. I now believe the administrators have used us, in a very cunning. clever and wonderful way to help in this whole sorry mess. if we get through this i'd love buy them a pint
  19. The internet, Twitter esp has played it's part in this whole situation. It'd be niave to think the players don't read these sites, or get told about what's being said, they be as glued to info as much as we are despite what they'd say publicly. So we as fans have helped i personally feel
  20. I'm glad i'm off work and can stay online 18 hours a day!!!!
  21. Here's what i've posted on the Rangers FB page i help run Good morning. It's all good news for you. The most important bit of information i can give you is that the administrators are saying is highly unlikely that CW is any sort of Creditor to the club so we don't owe him anything. On the contrary, he could owe US money. This is brilliant news as the HMRC have categorically stated they wouldn't do a deal with CW in place. It now seems that even if we are found guilty we will be able to pay off the debt in instalment and we could even only pay back 10P in the pound which means we only owe them £4.9 million of the big and i'd hope roughly £1.2M of the wee tax case (no one seems to know exactly how much the wee tax case is) This will now mean that the interested parties looking at us will step up and talk to the administrators "officially" i feel because it is the HMRC case that would hold back any new prospective owners making a bid while we're in administration Administration have also said that it looks like we will have a new owner by the start of may. There's a "handful" of interested buyers, some we as the public are aware of, some we have not, some in the UK some abroad, which is very interesting. They also hint that there some very rich people looking at us but don't want their names put out there, which is very normal when you buy a big business. This was absolutely wonderful to hear this morning. They also hinted that the reason they said we had "48 hours to find a buyer" was to force peoples hands, mainly the Blue Knights, a game of poker and mind games, which for us is toucher but a necessary evil in this game unfortunately, and once this is all done and dusted i'm sure the administrators will apologise for putting us through the mill like that I picked up that they actually think the Blue Knights might be doing this to "get in the papers", although i'm not 100% that they mean the Blue Knights themselves, it might be someone else (I'll post the links i got my info from in replies to this post) But what ever they mean, i now actually believe they are doing it for the good of Rangers football club, which is you and i, and not working for CW, why else would they say he's not a main creditor? *****WE ARE NOT OUT OF THE WOODS YET PEOPLE SO DO NOT READ THIS AND THINK,"YES WE ARE NOT GOING TO GO INTO LIQUIDATION THIS COULD STILL HAPPEN******* It also looks like the players will now take the wage cuts therefore keeping this squad we have together till the end of the season, which is a must for us to be able to find a buyer, in fact it's essential, forget about ability, we want a sellable commodity and with out a team of first team player we are not as sellable to anyone. The HMRC have to be thanks for being so helpful to us. This was not their fault/. it's simple, we should have paid our taxes in both the big and small tax case. So please never ever call them cunts. CW pissed them off big time but it seems that the tax people, and i'm talking right up to the powers that be in the tax section of The houses of Parliament BTW know that we got "stung" be previous and current owners, they know who we are and what we mean to millions of people, and they've said,"We don't want an institution like The Rangers to go out of business" The administrators have taken a bit of stick over the last few days, it seems to me that they had to do and say what they did to weed out the potential buyers that were full of shit, and to actually bring the genuine bidders to the table. I k ow a lot of you say,"They should tell us who the bidders are" Unfortunately it doesn't work like that, people don;t want to show their hands to other bidders who'll then undercut them. To round up what i've said, the light at the end up the Tunnel has got significantly brighter today, but still be on your guard for bad news, don't let this post make you think that we're saved. We're not until we see the new owner in the Blue Room in front of the press. I know we've been there and bitten by CW, but i'd doubt very much the admin guys will let that happen again, they will go right through a new owner, bigtime. I hope this puts you lot in a good mood for your friday. All the best Frankie (links to follow)
  22. The question on all our lips is,"Why didn't you carry out the fit and proper person test when CW appeared on the scene"?
  23. This is what we were dreading. Hopefully this being released will force the players into submission
  24. I've put a positive spin on it. May be there's been significant progress with a new buyer(s) hence the change of tone?
  25. It's insulting and goes against what they said they'd do in that first press conf
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.