Jump to content

 

 

Calgacus

  • Posts

    1,258
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Calgacus

  1. Add this to the abuse that Chris Graham gets from them, and you've got to wonder about them.
  2. The conspiracy theorists among us would no doubt have fun with the apparent coincidence, that the day it is announced that Charles Green has severed his links with Rangers, Charlotte Fakes disappears!
  3. Is this one of Jack's stories to damage the McColl camp by trying indirectly to associate them with the Murray era?
  4. Don't remember them making all this fuss about cost when the Easdales were trying to force an EGM. I would liked to ask him why we have two PR companies both earning thousands of pounds a month from the Club. I don't see how it enhances the Club's image when MH are issuing threats against the representatives of a substantial, number of share holders.
  5. but what's the point of people putting more money in, if it's just going to be wasted due to a lack of good governance?
  6. who has been arrogant?
  7. he is very weak - at the first sign of trouble he runs first to Uncle Charlie and then to Uncle Jack - all at the Club's expense!
  8. No doubt part of a "charm" offensive
  9. The article is almost like some sort cryptic clue in a crossword puzzle!
  10. Accepting only one of the guys put forward in the requisition and keeping all the existing directors in place means no change at all - they would be able to outvote him and keep running things as they are at present - to suit themselves.
  11. When you add these comments to the email about fans writing to the CE he does seem pretty contemptuous about most things Rangers.
  12. I may be reading too much into it, but is it normal for an external PR guy to be so involved in the day to day operations of the business that he's able to make these judgments?
  13. I haven't had the strength to look at that thread on RM. I'm always saddened by the abuse that some posters are willing to dish out to their fellow supporters.
  14. The people who have invested and taken nothing out obviously have confidence in them and I suspect they know rather more about Corporate matters than you do.
  15. Are you referring to the shareholders who signed the EGM requisition?
  16. It also ignores the fact that the requisition for the EGM is supported by institutions who have put substantial sums into the Club, and unlike Mather and Stockbridge have taken nothing out.
  17. They must be terrified that the new Directors come in and go through the books with a fine tooth comb and tell us where the money has actually gone.
  18. Why should the Club be paying so some people can try and hang onto their well paid jobs? They were quick enough to squeal about the cost of an EGM, though they were pretty quiet when Easdale was demanding one.
  19. It shows how incompetent the Board is...an official statement saying Irvine doesn't speak for the Club and a few days later they are hiring him.
  20. what a moron
  21. I'm sure that Malcolm Murray's role in obtaining lot of the investment from city institutions has been mentioned before. I suppose some of the factions were keen to downplay his successes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.