forlanssister

What difference have the multiple fines made? Celtic were so disgusted at their behaviour that they rewarded them by building a standing section.

Nil by Mouth has had a hidden agenda since it's inception, there is no way on earth you could have been RST Secretary and not been aware of that.

Of course it's a legitimate question but it's also a stupid one in the terms of the integrity of the survey.

It's also entirely legitimate to leave said question blank.

Had it been adequately planned and resourced by the SFA there would have been no public order. They have everything to do with it as the judges showing clear bias against Rangers fans are the same judges you want to judge Rangers for the behaviour of their fans, if you think that bias will evaporate then you're deluded if anything it will get worse. References to the season being extended etc are references to the bias shown against Rangers by the very institutions you want to implement strict liability. The poll on Club 1872 is running something like 94% against to 6% for the adoption of strict liability.

Why don't you go up on a supporters bus and you can regale them with the virtues of strict liability?

Simon Jordan ‏@Sjopinion10 41m41 minutes ago More I see #rangersfc have not answered the LMA questions about Warburton, Here's perhaps why ,LMA have no standing and rangers don't have to

Imaginary tours of Japan so you can't extend the season fair? We've got a couple of suspensions and injuries and a player we didn't deem worthy of offering a contract to and then died playing for another club so we want our game postponed fair? The early payment of Gretna's prize money for going into administration and the theft of Rangers prize money for doing likewise fair? Is that the scrupulously fairness you want to see because that's the kind you'll get?

The people who dispensed "justice" in those cases and there ilk are the people you say will be doing likewise in the cases of strict liability. I don't think any young boy should have a criminal record, be sent to jail and have his life ruined for singing a song no matter which football club he supports. You're so out of touch with the average fan that it beggars belief.

They are all examples the reality of being associated with Rangers in the Scotland we now live in. They will be deciding guilt and the punishment. Ultimate responsibility lays at the door of the SFA, it was their ground and their competition. They conducted a whitewash to clear their own arse and that of the Police. Because I live in the real world not Cloud Cuckoo Land. You've yet to produce any evidence it will be implemented in a fair way while all the anecdotal evidence indicates it most certainly won't. Yes strict liability has really worked in their case, really changed their behaviour hasn't it, been a real hindrance to them eh?

No doubt this is the kind of judge you want to see dispense justice. https://themanthebheastscanttame.wordpress.com/2016/04/22/the-auld-firm-song-remains-the-same/

How many judges have sentenced someone for using the word Hun compared to using the word Fen.ian? What proportion of Rangers fans on the Hampden pitch last May compared to the proportion of Hibs fans have been lifted? One Club will be picked to make an example of and we all know what Club that will be.

Aye right, in dreamland perhaps but not Scotland.

Oh aye and justice be dispensed with even handedness and without fear or favour? Do you want to buy a bridge?

Iain Sked ‏@skeddy1985 Follow More @RFC_Rab can we get a 'we've went 4-4-2'. Gif That was biggest talking point of the game

I'd certainly take for the interim period before many of the other names being bandied about.

He didn't gain control he was just part of a group that did. There are plenty of sticks with which to beat King with but I think there are many to used before this particular semantic, I'm far more concerned why this situation was allowed to fester the way it was reaching the point it did and far more concerned about the shambolic way it's been handled than whether the initial share purchase can be considered an investment or not.

When I buy shares in a company I consider it an investment the fortunes or more likely in my case the misfortunes of said company and certainly consider the purchase of the shares as part of my investment portfolio. If King were to sell the shares he purchased in the market back on to the market and reinvested the money in a new super duper rights issue would that be considered an investment?

So basically all the times I've bought shares in companies I've never actually made an actual investment in the company the only times I've actually made an actual investment is when I took part in any rights issues they had, is that correct?

Remove his wisdom teeth.

Apologies it was when the Toral/Hodson substitutions were made that Waghorn did that. It was 4-4-2 .

When Waghorn came on he signalled to the whole team FOUR-FOUR-TWO even holding his fingers up to make the point.

If it is him will he beat his record of 10 games without a win?

The Board gave them the increased contract last summer, this incident isn't about their pay at Rangers. They have been talking to other clubs since months after taking charge at Rangers, they've been talking to NF for a month, this didn't come out of the blue on Monday. The Boards actions have been reactive, the Board took to long to reach a decision (albeit undoubtedly the correct one).

Nobody comes out of this looking clever, the Board shouldn't have let it reach the stage it did and the 9pm website statement was not the way to release the news. As for the Three Amigos que, sera, sera.