forlanssister

The entrecote steak and herb butter at Cafe de Paris in Geneva is simply divine. Steak and chips is the only item on the menu.

The threshold in civil cases is balance of probability in criminal cases it's beyond reasonable doubt. Most settlements in civil cases (out of court) are on the basis of no admission of liability, any settlement such as this action would normally have little or no bearing on any criminal cases. I suspect in this instance the motion regards to expenses incurred when IIRC Rangers presented a motion in regards to certain documents then withdrew the motion after proceedings started, I'd be amazed if it was in relation to any settlement in the action against Charles green & others.

Thistle 1 - 3 Rangers FGS Holt

Definitely looking to toughen up the defence and midfield next season! [tweet]860902760581148672[/tweet]

The European Court told us we had to, even murderers get bail now. Human Rights anarat.

Hence the haste with with which Collyer Bristow's insurers pumped out a £24m settlement to BDO. Surmising the evidence so far it would seem Whyte was way out of his depth, Whyte a mere amateur whilst the bankers and Murray were Champions League players.

If you know what you're going to find then there's no point in looking.

The best (most comprehensive) twitter coverage seems to be provided by https://twitter.com/DJSHenderson

He's trying to sow enough seed of doubt in order to at least get "that bastard verdict" that's all he needs to do.

Saves them the airfare.

As it stands I tend to agree but I feel there's a few more revelations to come and by the conclusion of the trial that view may well change.

Yet the proof of funds letter that was accepted as proof was apparently unsigned.

IIRC that was briefly mentioned the other day, apparently it was unsigned.

Read Andrew Black's and James Doleman's twitter timelines of the proceedings so far and reach your own conclusion. I imagine both BDO and Octopus (Ticketus's parent) are following the proceedings very, very closely.

There will be a few arses clenching.

They were only interested in getting the loan repaid and closing Rangers accounts they simply didn't care who bought it as long as someone did.

Murray didn't fall for anything and neither did the bank.

I wouldn't call it trolling per se it's more part arrogance, part ignorance and a shit load of naivety.

Was that not in fact BoS money and not his 'own money' and has effectively been written off by the bank due to MIH's liquidation?

Just goes to show how far out of touch you are with the ordinary fans with practically every view you opine, be it Murray, Ashley, Llambias, Leach, strict liability, even King etc...etc.

"Son of convicted fraudster"?

Only 4 of the players named were Rangers players in the 90's.

[tweet]859136918965166085[/tweet]

If we have learned anything it's not how much you spend but how you spend what you have. Frankly I'm more interested in who the manager wants rid of than the size of any transfer pot.

I think it's too kind!