forlanssister

Agreed, you would think this would be an incentive to accelerate any potential deal not stop one in its' tracks.

I may or may not have a personal or business interest though but I won't know till I know who they are. I wholeheartedly agree re questioning the BK's there are many,many questions I would like to see them answer. As I've said before I'd like to see the same standards applied to the 3 bids.

Looks like they have some scepticism in Duff & Phelps too.

Don't for one minute expect each and every question to be answered but I do expect the alleged "Rangers businessmen" they intend to be placed on the board to be revealed and I reserve my right to write to any of their current employers to potentially complain and to make public the results if I feel the need arises.

My motive is a level playing field, let the same standards apply to each bid. I have no personal interest vested or otherwise in any of the 3 bids other than a desire to avoid the winding up of Rangers Football Club plc.

Questions were asked on this board about another of the bidders surely in the interests of fairness the same questions should be asked of any and all bidders?

So we're no more the wiser who the consortium members are, how much they are investing or who they intend to place on the board so basically it's "Trust me".

And why aren't they being revealed? How much is each member contributing?

Frankie ‏ @GersnetOnline Reply Retweet Favorite · Open Craig Whyte/Ticketus: Our advisers have spoken with both parties. #rfcng Looks like it BK's and Bill Ng that he's spoken with then.

Ok thanks. I'm with chilledbear in wanting to know who exactly the "Rangers supporting businessmen" are and what can they bring to Rangers.

Cheers, it was more along the lines of how can we ask a question, got absolutely no desire to join twitter or facebook though I will follow the session through the link on the front page.

How can us non twits participate?

The Scotman confirm one of the parties he's talked with.....

Yes that's my reasoning.

I'd hazard a guess it's Miller he's still to speak with, reasoning being the shareholding is irrelevant as far as Miller would be concerned.

I took it that Ticketus has security over the Group and that this is an attempt to circumvent the possible consequences of that security? also I don't think this one would stand up in court, it has the English equivalent of "gratuitous alienation" written all over it.

Yes it was a couple of weeks back., perhaps Bluedell or BH can explain the inns and outs of it better than I. Before anyone goes screaming "SOURCE? SOURCE?" just think for a second and work it out yourself it's not a secret and there's no attempt to deceive.

He has a debenture in favour of Liberty Corporate I'm not 100% certain that this would not be disallowed by the courts.

That's probably more like it, time is fast approaching for Duff & Phelps to actually deliver their promise that Whyte is an "irrelevance", I think someone will have egg on their faces(s).

Bit of a bonus, but it took him quite a long time to find both full fitness and form last time he comeback.

For clarification purposes I am not now, never have been and never will be a member of the RST and neither do I possess enough information on any bid to give it my unequivocal backing.

You're just trying to make me jealous Alas it's f*&King working!!!

Have a toke for me

It was only posted to provide proof of the original creation date, in fact that particular MG05 was the one that was subsequently stricken from the record anyway.