forlanssister

Think you have to be registered to get the full information. http://www.duedil.com/company/02183008/boniface-engineering-limited

WOW....such a sign of commitment from a devoted life long fan.......

Why have they not attempted to do anything about his shareholding or to challenge the validity of his floating charge, they throw about phrases like "has no value" "irrelevant" yet their sole method of separating Whyte from his shareholding has been simply to ask him to sign them over. You have to remember MCR/Duff & Phelps have been working since late summer 2010 devising a business plan for Craig Whyte to takeover RFC plc, they know everything. Their bill would have been substantial well on the way to 7 figures but who paid it? Whyte's not known for paying bill is he? pity we never got to see the accounts for the six months from Jan 11. One notable absentee from the creditors list was Grant Thornton, I doubt that's a coincidence.

What like saying Whytes' shareholding is irrelevant then despite assurances that you could deliver it when push comes to shove you haven't got a f*&king clue how to separate Whyte from his shareholding? We've asked Whyte politely to sign over his shareholding but for some strange reason he isn't obliging

It's to be expected when it was the administrators drew up the business plan that got us here. Seriously has anyone ever seen an administration remotely like this one is panning out?

A lot of people who have done us ill have plenty to gain from us being liquidated. This case is more a PR exercise by Duff & Phelps than anything else.

Or they know it will collapse when we're liquidated.

Quite a declaration !

Will they have the balls to sue themselves ? I'd hazard a guess Collyer Bristows' defence may include the argument that they were just following their clients instructions to follow the very expensive business plan created by one David Greir for Craig Whyte but paid for by who I wonder.

Yup heard it too, not as stupid a ploy as people may think though.

Yes and a handy little tool it was too!

I just want the nightmare to end and a CVA obtained everything else is secondary at the moment really. (nice fishing smiley, hopefully we'll soon know who's the sprat and who's the mackerel)

Ticketus claimed they had a better deal on offer from Ngs' consortium than the one previously negotiated with the BKs, BKs declined to better the deal Ticketus had told them they had and stood aside to let the better deal go forward, pretty simple scenario really.

Well known fact if you go to the games !

He may well have spent money on it but who actually paid it? I'd hazard a guess it was not Craig Whyte.

Mr Withey knows where the bodies are buried and just as importantly who buried them!

LOL... their minimum charge is 10% + expenses

An update from The Lawyer

And you're in a position to categorically prove that Ng has money and the BKs' have none?

He shouldn't beat himself up too much about the offside rule after all there was an assistant referee at Hampden on Sunday who didn't know it either....

That's my interpretation of it too.

**Incoming!!!!!!!!**

Agreed in principle to pay a fee for "exclusivity". I assume they were still negotiating re your last two questions, sorry but don't know if there was an outcome to that or not.

Kennedy by several light years!

No need for Mulder and Scully as even Closeau or *********** **** would manage to deduce that one!