forlanssister

This was originally posted on FF and picked up by STV. Perhaps some of the accountants on here could explain whether this particular scenario is possible or not.

Ah, a nice moment of levity ...

My interpretation is it's in preparation for admin part 2, but Bluedell is far,far more qualified to answer the question than I am, so if he contradicts my answer go with his! Oops just seen Craig's answer go with it!

John Bennett was willing to put his money where his mouth is though eh? It does seem to have a Heath Robinson look about it.

From Southampton site

That appears to be a commodity that isn't required to buy a Scottish football club!

That in itself is a sad indictment, not of you but rather the lack of adequate promotion.

http://www.rangerspixelpage.com/

I'd hazard a guess there's a good few more.

Administration part two is a very real possibility.

Should be some fun when they have go cap in hand to their bank managers for increased facilities and are told, "You made your own bed now lay in it."

Even if we only secured the pitch then that would remove any possibility of a profitable redevelopment for a non-football use thus keeping the property vultures at bay forever.

We need something similar to the Chelsea Pitch Owners scheme if only to remove the threat of being separated from Ibrox.

Personally I'll settle for being in any league next season....

To be expected really.

Yes it stems from the complaint by the much maligned Alastair Johnston.

Perhaps it's worth the RFFF seeking out legal opinion on that point.

Would the actions of the SFA be considered prejudicial to any criminal enquiry since the enquiry is looking into the running of the club after purchase as well as the purchase itself?

Me neither....

Greed, the law and the clowns who handed them the keys to do it.

No not at all once the clause was in that was it, stunning piece of work from Duff & Phelps eh?

The clauses they had inserted in their contracts regarding a fixed fee sale are rock solid even paying them the unpaid portion of their wages couldn't alter that, Green could never have got a penny more than their clauses stated even if they had decided to transfer over.

On Planet Whyte apparently!

I suppose you could say it has helped him reduce the structural deficit and ergo monthly outgoings, I suppose he viewed the potential transfer fees as a means of a few months working capital.

Dear Player, I'm Charles Green I now own you, report for training next Thursday so I can sell you and make some money for my 20 investors. Charles Green CEO Sevo 5088