forlanssister

That's pretty much par for the course Green is God over there in the same way Whyte was anyone doubting that orthodoxy is automatically a labelled a Tim/Feni@n/T@ig/Kerryfail accountant.

........

The Telegraph.

And now because of Murray's response our enemies delight in revelling in a story that had passed them and almost everyone else by.

The original article but the response gave the BBC the story.

It appears the article in question is two months old and has had 11,433 views, I wonder how many hits it's had today?

Not as far as I'm aware but all the response did was widen the audience.... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19891667

I eagerly await Malcolm Murray's statement in return.....

Also gaining plaudits at the failed solicitors' site ! JimBhoy October 8, 2012 at 5:24 pm This wasnâ??t written by Leggo, thatâ??s for sureâ?¦ http://www.gersnet.co.uk/index.php/latest-news/86-rip-it-up-and-start-again 14 0 Rate This Reply Kenny McCaffrey October 8, 2012 at 5:55 pm Excellent post â?? thanks for the link JimBhoy. Good to see there are some decent thinkers among the Ibrox faithful. 13 0 Rate This Reply TheObroni October 8, 2012 at 5:58 pm Great spot JimBhoy, a breath of fresh air to read a Rangers fans website that is actually asking the right questions. There just may be hope after all. 9 0 Rate This Reply ecojon October 8, 2012 at 7:03 pm @ JimBhoy What an enjoyable read from a thinking Bear who obviously cares deeply about his club and has some really good ideas. 9 0 Rate This Reply

Pray tell just who are these "Hopped Horrors" that you maintain post here?

All the statement will achieve is to give the original article a far wider audience than the article actually merits.

Don't really see the need to issue a statement in response to the original article though perhaps it hit a raw nerve.

There's nothing earth shattering in there in fact it's basically just telling us what we already know and what many have been saying for long enough, "Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen pounds nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."

Man up and name and shame or desist from throwing baseless accusations around.

Pity no one has made a gif of McCullochs ridiculous swan dive in a pathetic attempt to win a penalty for which he was rightly booked.

I wasn't being facetious, just wanting to see if there was anything comparative to look forward to.

And here's the proof!!!! Follow rhys mccabe ‏@rhysmccabe16 Just picked up the new car #happyaslarry pic.twitter.com/WIiPDsNZ

Got an example of it actually working out at any of these "few clubs"?

"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others."

http://test54coplandroad.blogspot.co.uk/

The Final Straw

Well if it was for "footballing reasons" then he's far, far worse a manager than even you or I think ( or rather fear) !

The problem I have (and no doubt others too) is my shares ergo my vote. In the case of Whyte it would not have made a blind bit of difference whatever structure held the shares he didn't control.

Irrespective of the virtues of Ian Black's nocturnal activities just why the f*&k did he get a start and Kyle Hutton (motm our last 2 games) get a seat in the stand?

Believe me he'll take anybody's money (he's said that himself numerous times). The timing of a flotation so soon after the initial purchase should be in itself a warning. Last time Green brought a football club to the market it was Sheffield United at 60p per share when he left a few months later they were 30p per share they were subsequently delisted at 6p per share a 90% loss for those who bought in the flotation.