forlanssister

He was being facetious

Physician heal thyself! springs to mind.

Yes his, by the use of the question mark you're insinuating that it's someone else's £20m, pray tell whose if not Kings? I don't think anything said or done by King, Smith or Hart was out of order in any way shape or form for they all undoubtedly have Rangers at heart. Your own link proves that far from being "neck deep in tax trouble" he is now at worst waist deep and at best standing on dry ground, no? I take it that's a typo and you in fact mean not doing their job properly. That's incorrect, he's always had the ability to invest and do business here albeit with the permission of the court as demonstrated by the unwinding of Murray Sports Limited for which King sought and was granted the permission of the court otherwise it could not have been facilitated. Which begs the question why start a thread with it in the first place?

Looks like he's won Round 1 and it may take 5 years for Round 2 to commence if it ever does, so not quite out of the woods yet. King may be a lot of things but he's nobody's fool. Took a fair bit of stick for going against the grain and stating that liquidation was the inevitable outcome of the administration process early on.

Oh well it must be true then if it came out of Green's mouth, who am I a mere fan to doubt any of Green's words!

No, my post to which you replied was in regards to games in Glasgow

David Murray had an uncanny ability to persuade otherwise rational businessmen to part with their cash, add NTL and their circa £15m to that list.

How so ?

He had just under 5% till the unwinding of Murray Sports Limited then had 5.3% If you ever read the RFC accounts or Plus Markets announcements then details are in there.

Simplistic or not it's true.

Just like Queen of the South and Inverness Caley eh?

A Rangers fan who spunked 20m of his own cash on us and he's not welcome yet a non Rangers fan whose sole intention is to take millions out of us is thought of as some sort of Messiah. It's a f*&ked up world.

For some of us Glasgow is pretty remote!

Perhaps, but he is/was senior partner at Hacking & Paterson.

En serio ?

Was that UK ESPN or Spanish ESPN ?

Hacking & Paterson iirc. Agreed but sadly a necessary evil in most circumstances, in saying that I do my own factoring.

The role of non-executive director carries with it statutory duties, there is no distinction between executive directors and non-executive directors in that respect.

His duties being a non-ex director are a lot more extensive than his quote relates to.

In the context that a former director becomes a present director.

Plus ca change!

Nor Cairney !

There was/is no "if" about it. Keep digging.

Plenty challenged it but were ignored, again no expertise was required.

Do I really? Please link to the posts demonstrating so. You're simply trying to excuse your own ignorance of the facts by claiming it's ok because everyone else was ignorant too.