Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

  • Posts

    12,264
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. Looks like he's won Round 1 and it may take 5 years for Round 2 to commence if it ever does, so not quite out of the woods yet. King may be a lot of things but he's nobody's fool. Took a fair bit of stick for going against the grain and stating that liquidation was the inevitable outcome of the administration process early on.
  2. Oh well it must be true then if it came out of Green's mouth, who am I a mere fan to doubt any of Green's words!
  3. No, my post to which you replied was in regards to games in Glasgow
  4. David Murray had an uncanny ability to persuade otherwise rational businessmen to part with their cash, add NTL and their circa £15m to that list.
  5. He had just under 5% till the unwinding of Murray Sports Limited then had 5.3% If you ever read the RFC accounts or Plus Markets announcements then details are in there.
  6. Simplistic or not it's true.
  7. Just like Queen of the South and Inverness Caley eh?
  8. A Rangers fan who spunked 20m of his own cash on us and he's not welcome yet a non Rangers fan whose sole intention is to take millions out of us is thought of as some sort of Messiah. It's a f*&ked up world.
  9. For some of us Glasgow is pretty remote!
  10. Perhaps, but he is/was senior partner at Hacking & Paterson.
  11. En serio ?
  12. Was that UK ESPN or Spanish ESPN ?
  13. Hacking & Paterson iirc. Agreed but sadly a necessary evil in most circumstances, in saying that I do my own factoring.
  14. The role of non-executive director carries with it statutory duties, there is no distinction between executive directors and non-executive directors in that respect.
  15. His duties being a non-ex director are a lot more extensive than his quote relates to.
  16. In the context that a former director becomes a present director.
  17. Plus ca change!
  18. Nor Cairney !
  19. There was/is no "if" about it. Keep digging.
  20. Plenty challenged it but were ignored, again no expertise was required.
  21. Do I really? Please link to the posts demonstrating so. You're simply trying to excuse your own ignorance of the facts by claiming it's ok because everyone else was ignorant too.
  22. No expertise was required.
  23. It's not in f*&king hindsight at all. The reasoning had absolutely no legitimacy at all at the time and made no sense at all unless you wished to deceive.
  24. But the simple undeniable fact is that the FTT had absolutely f*&K all to do with the accounts not being published nor the AGM not being held that was down solely to Whyte and Whyte alone.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.