forlanssister

Yes it's quite bizarre you ask a question and when it's answered factually you automatically conclude it's an attack on Green. So show me the basis in law for Green or anybody else for that matter being able to limit someones stake in a publicly quoted company to 15% ditto for the AIM rule enabling him to do likewise.

Probably because there is no basis in law for the 15% claim and it'll be contrary to the AIM rules.

The curse of the "turnaround specialist" strikes again. Doesn't portray Allenby Capital in the best of lights either, but in fairness the damage was done long before they arrived on the scene.

On the contrary think Leveson is giving Salmond a non too subtle 'There by the grace of God' type warning.

This probably means nothing in the greater scheme of things but you can already get RFC branded official adidas gear. http://www.rangerscharitystore.com/index.php/fashion/rcf-adidas-3-stripe-clima-cool-polo.html

It's ironic that had GerSave functioned the way it was intended then there would have been nothing to return to members.

Show me one post where I've said Green was the anti-Christ. I'm just glad such a "cracking businessman" is looking out for us now that he understands the meaning of corporate governance.

I never said you did.

Ah well that'll make up for Green's extremely tenuous business prowess!

F*&k sake a second hand name rejected and forsaken by Geordies for the heady heights of a legalised loan shark.

Far from being the excuse it's the motive.

I doubt Murray can so much as fart without the permission of LBG, though Murray may own 70% of the voting stock compared to LBG's 30% LBG have complete control of other financial instruments as well as being the company's bankers. For all intents and purposes the Murray Group is but a subsidiary of LBG.

We were the not too succulent sacrificial lamb to appease the God of Mammon.

We couldn't qualify through the CL against Malmo or the EL against Maribor with a far superior squad to what we'll have when we return to the topflight (in whatever format), we'll have no co-efficient points of our own and would probably have to play in the very first qualifying rounds the better part of a month before we play league football against teams half way through their season.

For al intents and purposes CL is a pipedream, we'll have a co-efficient of practically zero and it would take a couple of more years in the EL to build it up. Assuming we'll be sufficiently competent to qualify for the CL through whatever league is equally as risky as assuming qualification through a Cup winners/runners up spot.

I doubt a bastardised solution would suffice, if the SFA were smart instead of standing on the sidelines watching events unfurl they'd be taking the lead in which in all probability will be a once only opportunity to encompass Scottish football under one corporate body.

Sorry, assumed you meant into Europe via the SPL which in itself is not necessary. It appears Green thinks differently.

It won't mean we're eligible for Europe any quicker though will it ?

I don't see any split over the SPL, every Bear I've talked to is of the opinion that the SPL can go f*&k themselves a view which Green seemed to share till his volte face.

Talk of Europe at this stage is simply a red herring. Fact is Green like his predecessors speaks with a forked tongue and treats the fans with contempt and disdain when it suits his purpose.

I love how you try and deflect a simple yes or no question, so which is it yes or no?

You mean you never believed Greens claim of "While I'm chief executive, Rangers will not play in the Scottish Premier League." in the first place?

Was it not a secretary from Balfour & Manson Anyway hopefully Mr Black v HMRC turns into something tasty!

There's nothing unambiguous about his previous statement it's crystal clear in its' intent, fast forward a month and it's all change in the same way "no debt" became "no external debt".

No I took not playing in the SPL to mean not playing in the SPL.