forlanssister

That's quite an eye-opener.

Read the prospectus and you'll see that it's not for promotion to the top flight rather it's for leaving the SFL. He'll leave the building long before he's 70, he's certainly not scared to put in the hours and if he has the balls to sack McCoist and his cohorts then he'll go up in my estimation.

One of the most surreal moments I've ever witnessed at the football which I don't think anyone present will ever forget. A very fitting tribute.

Ask our Director of Communications.....

Perhaps he's like his brother who stated on BBC Radio Scotland a few weeks back that, "I'm not really a fan of Rangers".

Yes I know. But we're pure anti Green and all that. On the contrary it shows a grasp of reality. You try appealing to the court against a judgement when you refused to engage in the process.

Lol I now find myself having to defend Green in the face of you're deranged logic.

Do you think he's refused to engage with our legal team and the RFFF? Woho at last! It certainly beggars belief. When in a hole and all that, eh?

Haha, any chance of getting a quarter of what you're smoking? You do realise by denying Green got the initial strategy wrong you are in fact disagreeing with him?

Quoted to get round censorship!

Of course you're privy to all the information that they are? The very fact that they are representing us at the hearing is an admission from Green that his strategy was in fact the wrong one in this instance, he's admitted he was wrong but you know better than him?

Whether you agree will it or not it remains a fact that Green called this one wrong. Or perhaps you think that Green is correct and the extremely capable legal team are wrong?

Indeed nor are the actual factors that deem the bonus to be payable mentioned plus it just needs to be approved by the Chairman or CEO. Effectively it looks like his bonus will equate to a tax on our commercial contracts.

LOL, once again just admit Green called this one wrong and the RFFF are saving his face.

Take a look at board remuneration if Green, Stockbridge and Ahmed get their bonuses as set out in the IPO document then that alone could be skywards of £2m. Why do we still employ the Travel Club staff when there won't be a Travel Club as such for at least another 3 years? Why do we still have a full complement of hospitality staff when hospitality is substantially down? etc. etc.

On the contrary appealing after the fact would be a waste of both time and money, whilst being represented legally at the hearing would be a far more productive use of time and money. This has been pointed out to Green and that's the reason for the volte face , just admit it Green called this one wrong...

This is actually a better use of funds than not engaging in the process and subsequently appealing though I still think the club should be picking up the tab. It seems that despite Greens bluster and bravado on the matter legal opinion and common sense has prevailed.

It's not, it's for the kangaroo court.

Why do you think we're know being represented at the said kangaroo court now? Would it be because Green was given legal opinion that his strategy was utterly self defeating and doomed to fail by in fact giving our enemies an open goal?

Why don't you practice what you preach then you can tell Green where McCoist's going wrong?

Gazborangers ‏@gazborangers Not one question about player development, timescale of Ibrox upgrades or pie in sky G51 project, Green really does get an easy time Gazborangers ‏@gazborangers Reminds me of one AGM when Murray placated the meeting by announcing return of black and red socks.

That was inevitable this season at least.

I think the point elfideldo was making in the op has been well and truly lost. He's not advocating we do a wholesale copy of the Barca model but rather pointing out serious flaws in Sinclair's modus operandi.

His shareholding far exceeds 29%, he got an exemption from the takeover rules. Trainer the second biggest shareholder just "sold" £5.25m worth of shares from his personal holding to one of his companies to help fund his divorce. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/celtic-tycoon-sells-5-million-1545820 If there is anything at all to this story it'll just be Desmond trying to recoup some of his cash on the back of the rise in their share price.