forlanssister

It's not an insult rather a back handed compliment.

You were asked You've yet to name a successful club where the owners are in it to make money. Newcastle owe Ashley over £140m and were relegated under his tenure. Bolton are £136m in debt and were relegated. Southampton just came out of administration not all that long ago and its' present owners had to convert £33m of debt into equity.

But then I would miss the hilarious unintended humour that many of your posts contain!

Your trolling is becoming rather boring now, Newcastle owe Ashley over £140m furfuxsake. http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/local-news/mike-ashley-wipes-newcastle-uniteds-1361590

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

Deary me, are you leading the campaign to have him declared a Living Saint or just trolling now?

The most important criterion should be ability.

Why are the stating "Rangers Security Services Limited" today when it changed it's name to Garrion Security Services Limited on 3/12/2012 ?

Just to clear them a little more. If you look at the charges against the Worthington Group plc you'd notice a debenture created on 28/01/2013 and registered on 1/02/2013 in favour of a company called Renatus Capital Limited which gives it a "Fixed and Floating Charge Over The Undertaking and All Property and Assets Present and Future, Including Goodwill, Bookdebts, Uncalled Capital, Buildings, Fixtures, Fixed Plant & Machinery". Renatus Capital Ltd was incorporated on 11/10/2012 there are no shareholders and it's sole listed director is a Miss Sherri Louise Ellison. It's registered address is the all too familiar 48 Skylines Village Limeharbour London E14 9TS United Kingdom If you check out the directorship history of Miss Sherri Louise Ellison you'll see she has many directorships in common with both Craig Whyte and the Earley brothers. Worthington Group plc is now structured in such a way that when it inevitably goes into liquidation Whyte and Earley get first dibs on everything. Worthing Group plc purchasing the "rights" to the Craig Whyte story last week only hastens it's demise.

On the whole that's a fair enough summation, Whilst I agree the tabloid style of the article doesn't do it any favours I wouldn't so easily dismiss the links therein though considering (part of) its' apparent origins that may appear a touch Mandy Rice Davies-ish...... Any reasonably minded bear should be able to separate the wheat from the chaff fairly painlessly enough. Perhaps, but people should be careful not to dismiss everything out of hand particularly if it's simply because they dislike the message or the messenger. The Worthington Group connection I first posted about last June being one example, whilst it may have been dismissed as of little relevance last June it's not so easily dismissed after the events of last week. The constant rants of Mad Vlad prove just how impotent the SFA are when it comes to punishing owners, however when it comes to punishing clubs mere technicalities such as their own rules or the law of the land prove no barrier to them, that I fear is where we will find ourselves if Whyte can prove any or all of his claims (which I think is a very,very remote possibility), at the mercy of the SFA , the potential ramifications are such that they simply cannot afford to be totally discounted. Likewise!

i assume the no was a typo. Of course he'll have to prove he has equitable ownership of Sevco 5088 in order for everything else to follow. Whyte is after money he doesn't give a f*&k where it comes from. It's simply not in the SFA's power to prevent Whyte from owning shares in a plc. Assuming he does obtain a shareholding in RIFC then the consequences for the club could be potentially catastrophic. I concur I think your incorrect in that summation. Whyte's defence was basically an admission of "financial assistance" then blaming Ticketus for allowing him to commit "financial assistance", his written submission of defence should be available somewhere. (That's a different document from the judgement of Master Marsh btw) I know he's deluded, I know he's an amoral sociopath but alas that doesn't always mean the side of law and justice will fall automatically against him. I doubt it was anything other than shifting money out of Worthington Group to another Whyte/Earley company in advance of it going tits up, it lacks sufficient assets to make good the pension deficit if loses the case for the return of the Collyer Bristow client account money.

It formed part of Whyte's original "proof of funds". Whyte tried to make restitution ? You mean he tried to regain control of it surely? Any action Whyte raises will not be in relation to any debt as you're claiming above, but rather on Craig Whyte's claim that he was an equitable owner of Sevco 5088.

It was part of the money found in the Collyer Bristow client account on behalf of the RFC Group Ltd (Wavetower). IIRC D&P, HMRC , Merchant House Group (for all intents and purposes Whyte) and Worthington Group plc (again Whyte) are all claiming the money, IIRC D&P dropped the claim in order to sue Collyer Bristow for £25m (now being psued by BDO albeit through a different set of solicitors).

The connection between Whyte and Worthington is irrefutable and ongoing. All Whyte did last week was move money out of one company associated with him to another under the guise of selling the film rights etc, it the sort of thing he's ( and Earley) always done. I'm inclined to think Whyte is banking on the nuisance value of any claim of his but to rule out the possibility that any of his claims has validity would be a foolish act. This has a long way to run yet. It took 9 years to complete the liquidation of Whyte's Vital UK Ltd.

Do you remember the monies found laying in the Collyer Bristow client account? Specifically the circa £3m attributed to the Jerome Pension Fund well that belongs to the pensioners of the Worthington Group. Here's the last paragraph of the Interim Financial Statement issued by the Worthington Group plc on 29 November 2012.

Doesn't seem to tally with the official statement....

Damned by faint praise !........

Last one that fitted that bill didn't pan out too well eh?

Imran invented a job for himself, don't be surprised if that particular position becomes surplus to requirements.

It means he wants his bonus paid.

Whilst Rangers have been undoubtedly good for Charles Green I remain to be convinced that the arrangement will prove to have been a reciprocal one.

He's strictly the author of his own misfortune and if you take off the Green tinted spectacles you'd be able to see that.

That was 6 months after the Banstead money. 50% of the Arsenal shares money has been paid to the administrators with a further 45% expected when the administration of Pritchards is complete.

The one from Earley was quite humourous in it's on way, said Craig was upset at the bad publicity he was getting and something about death threats he was receiving being Green's fault, Imran's reply was basically a go away or we'll report you to the police for blackmail. Green made a big play of ensuring everyone present in the room noticed the date on the emails, they were both dated 29 October 2012. Although we were only shown the two emails I got the impression that this was far from the first or only correspondence between the two parties regarding the matter.

Nothing in this whole sorry saga could be described as remptely approaching "normal"! Emails from Aidan Earley to Imran Ahmed and vice versa, I belief it was the same ones he was showing round at the RST dinner.