forlanssister

Ah such a serenely blissful illuminating post, thanks for setting me straight.

Doesn't alter the fact that the relationship between Jack Irvine/Media House and RFC while having been extremely rewarding for the former has been extremely damaging for the latter as witnessed by the trashing of the former directors whilst beatifying Whyte. Also the fact that they were batting for both sides simultaneously during the Whyte takeover Hay & McKerron being merely a fig leaf. In fact the FARE and Desmond stuff just demonstrate how ineffective they were at defending the club as opposed to certain individuals.

Try reading the prospectus, the myth that "he can only sell them next October" is 100% pure unadulterated bullshit.

Haven't heard the tapes yet but the postings of CF over the last couple of days seem to confirm just how damaging Jack Irvine and Media House have been to RFC over the years.

In another of lifes strange coincidences Craig Mather's wife is a solicitor with the firm that is representing Naismith and Whittaker, albeit in a different office.

Apparently about to do great things according to Mather at NARSA. I wait with baited breath.

Was great thanks. Barbarians at the gate.

Not strictly true, things do get censored/removed only fools would run a board that left everything untouched. Though this place lets far more be than any other Rangers forum I know.

Have they actually bought them or "borrowed" them?, we're an open target for short sellers.

Ahmad wants cash same as everyone else in the sorry saga that has become RFC, if it takes a boardroom confrontation for him to maximise his return them we'll get one irrespective of the potential damage to RFC.

Mather waxes lyrical of "honesty and transparency" one minute and the next tries his hardest to avoid either virtue. The involvement of Laxley does not bode well.

He's smarter than most and hides it well but on occasion his mask slips.

Normally I'd wholeheartedly agree but I'm led to believe there are valid legal reasons for it not being published (for now at least).

A half decent outcome, for all Malcolm Murray's foibles he's one of the few who have put Rangers before themselves.

Other than the 33% ratio of wages to turnover claim nothing whatsoever resembling a business plan in the slightest has been put forward by Green & Co.

Now.now!! Debating, debating !!.....

Though my wife has on many ocassions threatened to cut off my balls off they are still very much firmly attached, and I'll be studiously avoiding the Castro district in San Francisco.....

First set of lock-ins expire on June 20 iirc.

It's the various lock-ins ergo no liquidity in the market that is keeping the share price artificially high. Thing to remember is circa 20m shares only cost their owners 1p each.

You are indeed mistaken, Ahmad has already gone.

This place will be a beacon of positivity for a couple of weeks......

Aye .

Anyone else going over next week?

Certainly preferable to the return of Green & Ahmad.

McLaughlin doing the batting for Green and Ahmad again, how can he claim Malcolm Murray "survived" when no votes were actually held on any subject at all? and as for his claim of another meeting scheduled for next week oh no there's not.