Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,264

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

 Content Type 

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. forlanssister
    Neither Laxey nor Prior bought their shares at rock bottom though did they?
  2. forlanssister
    Merlin doing his daily fellating of Sandy Easdale.
  3. forlanssister
    THe Laxey "loan" alone should be reason enough to question their fiduciary duty.
  4. forlanssister
    That's quite a damning indictment also noticible is the lack of dimplomatic nicities that were present in King's previous statements.
  5. forlanssister
    That's how Capitalism works otherwise it could not function.
  6. forlanssister
    The Easdale "loan" is PR guff from Toxic Jack, as others have alluded it won't be drawn down as there will £1m advanced by Ashley/Sports Direct. The Wonga comparison earlier on the thread is misleading as the Wonga for Business rate is 0.5% per week.
  7. forlanssister
    26.5p is the maximum price they will have to pay, they know we'll need a rights issue and a lower price actually suits them as they're effectively lowering the average cost of their shares meaning they can exit with a profit with a lower share price than at present.
  8. forlanssister
    More than that when you factor in sigle match ticket sales, hospitality, cup games etc.
  9. forlanssister
    It appears Wallace is happy enough to lend his name to anything, only a matter of time before he gets his £300k payoff.
  10. forlanssister
    Norman Crighton (the Arab on the board) was placed on the board at Laxey's insistance as he himself admitted, he chairs the laughably named "Investment Committee", he appears to be serving his masters Laxey at the expense of everyone else when he has a fiduciary duty to all shareholders.
  11. forlanssister
    One rather bizarre side effect of this deal is that it is now in the interests of our largest shareholder to see the shareprice collapse over the next six months!
  12. forlanssister
    Any hope that Wallace would be a positive influence in the boardroom has all but vanished.
  13. forlanssister
    I look forward to them uniting under the banner of "Amalgamated Rangers Shareholding Entities".
  14. forlanssister
    Laxey originally paid £1 a pop, Prior 50 odd p, neither of them look too clever at the moment eh? Laxey are engaged in some pound cost averaging in order to spare their blushes. If King so much as purchased one solitary share then he is in the event of a takeover obliged by law to offer at least the highest price he has paid for a share in the last six months, you and der Berliner may want to work out the implications of such a course of action. If he followed your advice he may well shut the door forever as far as him having a meaningful part to play in the future of Rangers.
  15. forlanssister
    It's not by accident that RM is the de facto forum of MediaHouse.
  16. forlanssister
    £400k up front and the rest on the drip was the offer for Wallace turning I agree turning that down doesn't really merit much praise.
  17. forlanssister
    As Norman Lamont once said ''gives the impression of being in office but not in power''.
  18. forlanssister
    Reminded me of this: http://www.scribd.com/doc/162271091/Rangers-and-the-Old-Firm-Long-Firm
  19. forlanssister
    They are effectively doing now what Resolution 10 would have allowed them to do had it not been voted down. Also a benefit of it not being a straight share transaction at the present is the fact it is a loan and therefore a debt they are in prime position to control the process of an insolvency event.
  20. forlanssister
    Leaving it open for anyone to complete casts severe doubt on the professionalism of who decided to construct it in that matter. Of course it also gives them a perfect get out if they don't like the results.
  21. forlanssister
    It does ask for your Rangers number but it's not a requirement of completing survey neither is entering your name/address etc, any Tom,Dick or Tim can complete it.
  22. forlanssister
    By virtue of the fact that it appears Laxey and the Easdales are providing the loan together then they are acting "in concert" therefore no need for any formal pact or proxy agreement. Not quite sure if the Easdales still holding the various proxies and Laxey acting in concert would trigger the need to make a full offer since they would be over the 30% mark anyway, probably not hence the delay in the share part of the transaction.
  23. forlanssister
    Great in theory but doubt the reality will be of much use since any man and his dog can complete it. Should have been restricted to those with a Rangers number if the integrity of the responses was of major importance but perhaps it's a fig leaf.
  24. forlanssister
    It's a bit of a red herring as there are many ways round the 30% rule. They could simply get a dispensation like those across the city, If they don't purchase so much as a single share then convert at say 5p per share any offer just has to be at 5p per share effectively maintaining maximum control at minimal cost.
  25. forlanssister
    This is the Ahmad, Hughes loans all over again, It is pure unadulterated spivvery at it's finest.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.