Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,264

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

 Content Type 

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. forlanssister
    Thanks to all for the most convivial company it was a pleasure. Oh and apologies for the geriatric reprobate!............
  2. forlanssister
    Thanks for the memories....RIP
  3. forlanssister
    However it's dressed the result is the same, it'll be an extremely brave employee of a financial institutional that will sign off a loan/credit facility with that hanging over the club as Easdale and Laxey both demanding and receiving security over assets demonstrate. The legal niceties in this have years in which to play out, Whyte has to do very little as yet but the club cannot function normally in the business sense with this hanging over it Whyte knows this hence the Letter Before Claim being the cheapest option for him to hinder the club functioning. Whyte wants a pay off to go away it's that simple. I do not believe his claim has merit but from his point of view it has nuisance value. We'll continue to see that as long as the matter is unresolved.
  4. forlanssister
    No he didn't get it back.
  5. forlanssister
    Manus Fullerton is behind it, you heard it here first!......
  6. forlanssister
    I'm typing this slowly please read it in the same manner in the hope it may penetrate. THERE IS A CONTINGENT LIABILITY BECAUSE CRAIG WHYTE SENT A LETTER BEFORE CLAIM AS A RESULT OF THE ACTIONS OF CHARLES GREEN, NO AUDITOR IN HIS RIGHT MIND CAN IGNORE THAT WHETHER HIS CLAIM IS WITHOUT FOUNDATION OR NOT. There are accountants aplenty on here who can explain the ramifications ask one. If that were the case there would be no contingent liability would there?
  7. forlanssister
    Indeed there are just ask the shareholders of Enron, Lehman Brothers, Polly Peck yadda yadda yadda et al each and everyone got a clean bill of health from its' auditors.
  8. forlanssister
    I've already explained why the credibility or lack of it is irrelevant so desist with the trolling. There is as a result of the actions of Charles Green a contingent liability in the accounts which is preventing the club from carrying out the running of the business in the normal manner which part of that is causing you difficulty in comprehending?
  9. forlanssister
    Jesus wept!
  10. forlanssister
    Deloittes did though and surely that's what's important isn't it?
  11. forlanssister
    It's the reason no credible financial organisation will entertain RIFC and the reason for the cap in hand Easdale and Letham loans and you're not that dense that you didn't already know that eh?
  12. forlanssister
    Whether I give it credibility or not is irrelevant what is relevant is that the contingent liability exists in the accounts and that fact hinders the running of the club doesn't it?
  13. forlanssister
    But not the c*&t who told Whyte, "You are Sevco that's what we're saying?" We are unable to run the business of the club normally because we have a contingent liability and that is solely down to the actions of Charles Green no one else.
  14. forlanssister
    He is but a tool of the various incarnations of the board you continually champion in defiance of all reason and logic.
  15. forlanssister
    What odds on a one to one with Peter Adam Smith?
  16. forlanssister
    Well have a word with the one with the dodgy barnet then as his chums BPH have £50m just sitting around waiting to stick in have they not?
  17. forlanssister
    Direct me to the memo that says, "Thou must give Sandy Easdale and his cronies £500." You like the one with the dodgy barnet are confusing blind faith and loyalty.
  18. forlanssister
    A second administration would be the fault of industrial scale misfeasance in the Ibrox boardroom starting with your bumchum Chuckles, to try and pass the blame to the fans is utterly ridiculous.
  19. forlanssister
    It is also the main reason as to why the board/major shareholders won't contemplate the notion of any form of trust gaining security, they won't be a party to hemming themselves in.
  20. forlanssister
    Fixed it for you!
  21. forlanssister
    More likely to be Brownies!
  22. forlanssister
    You have that back to front, Winter is when clubs mortgage their season ticket revenue stream as clubs are flush with the season ticket monies in the summer. The exception to the rule being the Whyte era.
  23. forlanssister
    ...and a nice deflector shield for Wallace when facing awkward questions on his "review"!
  24. forlanssister
    Not convinced the Swallow would be ideal for picking up Taxis, it's the wrong side of the road and the traffic can take quite a while to clear that area post match. Corner of Edmiston Dr and PRW would be a far better option. Did ponder about taking the service bus along PRW but..... I'll happily go with the flow.
  25. forlanssister
    What will cause McCoist most problems next season will be the same at this one, the last one and the one before that and it's what he sees every time he looks in a mirror.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.