-
Posts
12,264 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
34
Everything posted by forlanssister
-
Claiming it didn't work is a tadge premature.
- 126 replies
-
- sponsorship
- rangers first
- (and 12 more)
-
Wallace: Rangers Need To Bring In £4million.
forlanssister replied to Rangersitis's topic in Rangers Chat
Better press that £5m button then Graham or there will be not enough cash to pay your bonus when it's due to be paid in Semptember. -
Picture 81-Willie Vass Shames Those in Charge
forlanssister replied to chilledbear's topic in Rangers Chat
She more often than not accompanies him to games, has done for years. -
Plan A - assemble a large squad of journeymen and former players and hope it clicks. Plan B - hope it clicks Plan C - hope it clicks Plan D - hope it clicks ad infinitum **Incase of emergency through McCulloch up front** God forbid someone suggests coaching, nurturing and giving some experience to young talent.
-
Some of the stuff we played under Eck was dire, 10 games without a win and all that but if feels now they were halcyon days compared to the utter turgid dross that McCoist is subjecting us to.
-
Picture 81-Willie Vass Shames Those in Charge
forlanssister replied to chilledbear's topic in Rangers Chat
On Tuesday night I went into the disabled toilet in the West Enclosure and it absolutely reeked of strang and the floor was filthy obviously not cleaned for months. Today I went into the other disabled toilet and it too reeked of strang and was filthy and to top it of there was no soap in the dispenser somebody had removed the previous empty cartridge and not replaced it. The wheelchair section in the West Enclosure is filthy with dirt and the drains are choked with grass cuttings. Taking a tour round the outside of Ibrox makes you want to cry it's gone beyond disgraceful. -
Why would any player Park scouted come to Rangers to be played out of position, regress and be subjected to woefully inadequate coaching?
-
Side splitting stuff,,,,, ......and back on the payroll!
-
Numerous incarnations but couldn't get anything to work rfc1972 grfc1972 rangers1972 etc....etc
-
For the masochist within yourselves. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/scotland/28715383
-
Clyde Cup Date Set - Monday, August 18 at 7.35pm
forlanssister replied to Zappa's topic in Rangers Chat
The reason is patently obvious. We're actually having to pay for the privilege of having our games televised same as the two previous seasons. -
He never did go away and he didn't sell his shares, just split them up and parked them via nominees.
- 78 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 16 more)
-
Heard that last week too.
- 78 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 16 more)
-
keith jackson @tedermeatballs 2m Full exclusive on Somers' olive branch to Dave King in tomorrow's Record. You're welcome.
- 78 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 16 more)
-
keith jackson @tedermeatballs 1m So David Somers says the RFC board is ready to talk to Dave King. Start of a takeover, complete desperation or smoke and mirrors?
- 78 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 16 more)
-
Personally I think he may well be the only one there worth the money. I don't think it's that extreme but I certainly question the wisdom of paying for both Nash and Stockbridge for a period.
- 78 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 16 more)
-
They miss the point the maximum 16 days per month isn't actually a maximum as it is accompanied by the following caveat:
- 78 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 16 more)
-
http://www.gersnetonline.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?64640-Board-Changes/page2
- 78 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 16 more)
-
You're both wrong!!!.... .....and you're both right!!! It's a combination of the two...
-
They've been overhead for years it's just that too many choose not to see them.
-
No option but pare it down, the Stockbridge share options and their ilk cast a long shadow.
-
Some will, some won't, all should and will grate.
-
We'll probably see that previous "one off costs" have to large extent been replaced by a range of new "one off costs", not convinced the monthly deficit will be as small as we think it should be.