Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,264

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

 Content Type 

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. forlanssister
    So your logic is you don't have a f*&king clue what Murray Park costs but want it scrapped because it costs too much?
  2. forlanssister
    We cannot go forward until those in charge are actually interested in running an actual football club something that has been totally absent since we fell into the control of Donald Muir for from that day since we have only been run by those who wanted their cut of the Filthy Lucre .
  3. forlanssister
    Why don't you tell us then?
  4. forlanssister
    It's certainly no great secret. The commercial department is on its' arse. I imagine it is the former ( save Red32 and Puma). No, but take a look the next time you're inside Ibrox and see for yourself.
  5. forlanssister
    It's not that we cannot afford a youth system but rather we cannot afford not to have one.
  6. forlanssister
    Add the fact that as cash strapped as we patently are all attempts by potential sponsors/advertisers to purchase trackside advertising since the end of last season have been instantly rebuffed.
  7. forlanssister
    "We" make plenty but apparently receive none as the claim of £2.7m not immediately available by the board testifies to.
  8. forlanssister
    If we have learned one thing over the last few years it is that this claim is utter and total bullshit.
  9. forlanssister
    Sorry never noticed a question just an attempt at self-validation.
  10. forlanssister
    Believe me you are neither my favourite nor a scapegoat, if truth be told I find you little more than a source of amusement. That works both ways though right? If that's the silly little game you want to play then there are many on here who can easily trump that.
  11. forlanssister
    No it's not from one post but rather your entire post history. Perhaps you've been too busy playing with your legendary ignore button (that for some reason never seems to actually work!) to notice this site actually contains...........lo and behold a search function!
  12. forlanssister
    Should those who weren't taken in now pretend they were taken in just to massage the ego's of those who were taken in ?
  13. forlanssister
    If he wants it he'll get it the only thing in doubt would be the exact timing. I'm not convinced he really needs to as he already has us by the balls.
  14. forlanssister
    Eh....Wow just wow.
  15. forlanssister
    He who pays the Piper calls the tune!
  16. forlanssister
    That's just a Party Political Broadcast for the Mike Ashley/Sports Direct Party.
  17. forlanssister
    I think you're well aware that there's no sexual connotation whatsoever to my remark.
  18. forlanssister
    He's been pro Whyte, pro Green, pro Imran, pro Stockbridge pro Mather yadda, yadda, yadda and has now adopted a pro Ashley stance. It's his own words that damn him not mine. Just saying like.
  19. forlanssister
    He's pro any c*&t that wants to rape us.
  20. forlanssister
    As noble a notion as it is I'm not convinced that the fan groups participation in the open offer is either in their or the clubs best long term interests as in all probability there's going to a massively dilutionary event not that far down the line.
  21. forlanssister
    Same thing, Filthy Lucre certainly helps keep the boredom at bay.
  22. forlanssister
    A great way to run a football club eh keep it alive till you get bored with it? We haven't received so much as a single penny from Rangers Retail and the way the company is set up may well never do so. If we had received the £2.7m Ashley is holding ransom then we wouldn't be in our current predicament.
  23. forlanssister
    Aye but they can only make money if the company is profitable anarat!
  24. forlanssister
    I assume that was auto correct and involvement is insolvent!
  25. forlanssister
    Over here after a court case we don't normally haul the loser back into court and try them with perjury simply because their evidence was given less weight by the Judge. However outrageous the claims in the affidavit may or may not be it doesn't therefore follow that they are lies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.