Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,269

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

 Content Type 

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. forlanssister
    Fairly easy to see the savings on your cost base if only the bare necessities TUPE over.
  2. forlanssister
    Most contracts will probably just state the statutory payments as laid down by the law of the land at the time, you'd have to be well up the tree to get anything different. If they're not there at the time of administration they can't TUPE over therefore they can rehire people at a lower rate than those jobs currently pay.
  3. forlanssister
    The way the ducks are being lined up you'd be forgiven for thinking they're gearing up for administration, this time round with all long term staff already paid off for the legal minimum there will be no one to TUPE over. Pre-pack anyone?
  4. forlanssister
    We employ in-house Legal Counsel that should be well within his capabilities but in saying that through experience they don't seem that familiar with the finer points of the Companies Act .
  5. forlanssister
    Couldn't possibly have a fan privy to the goings on though! Pretty sure that may well be an action to avoid being in breach of the Companies Act, perhaps the new NOMAD is actually doing its job.
  6. forlanssister
    If you didn't laugh you'd cry.
  7. forlanssister
  8. forlanssister
    keith jackson ‏@tedermeatballs 2m2 minutes ago Ashley and RFC sticking two fingers up at SFA. Llambias red hot fav for CEO role. Story in tomorrow's paper.
  9. forlanssister
    As much as I happily concede McCoist has to go and have suffered as much as anyone watching what he put out on the park. The Board's campaign to completely trash him is rather unedifying and unbecoming of what Rangers should be. Personally I hope he tells them to shove his contract up their arses and talks but I think that would be the least realistic outcome.
  10. forlanssister
    That was my understanding too, but it may well have been altered in their favour since.
  11. forlanssister
    Rangers Retail accounts are due 31 January.
  12. forlanssister
    At Rangers like in almost every other walk of life nowadays failure seems to reap it's own rewards.
  13. forlanssister
  14. forlanssister
    .....and we ain't getting there without serious money being pumped in.
  15. forlanssister
    It's the Board who've jeopardised the wage cycle and not for the first time either. Wonder is the £400k is deferred wages and ergo no payment of his notice period means he can open his mouth? Or just spin from the usual source to try and get him out as cheaply as possible?
  16. forlanssister
    Royalties are payments based on items sold. It's been described as the worst merchandise in history from a clubs point of view ,I'd be amazed if SD haven't protected themselves.
  17. forlanssister
    Put it this way, I wouldn't describe it as a good deal for Rangers.
  18. forlanssister
    gunslingers link should tell you all you need to know http://www.investopedia.com/university/peratio/peratio1.asp Also it's important to realise that SD do not pay dividends but reinvest for capital growth instead so the P/E ratio is important to him, Ashley's shares in SD are currently worth just over £2 billion.
  19. forlanssister
    Think about how the club came to owe £411k to SD, it wouldn't be because SD are guaranteed a certain level of profit but the club are not would it?
  20. forlanssister
    I see you got one hook, line and sinker....:fish:.......
  21. forlanssister
    49% of the royalty is my understanding.
  22. forlanssister
    Sports Direct are currently trading with a P/E ratio of 21.68. Ergo every million of profit SD extract from Rangers is worth £21.68m to the SD share price. Ashley owns 54% of SD ergo every million of profit SD extract from Rangers is worth circa £11.7m to Ashley.
  23. forlanssister
    That's just taken from the RFB minutes. It was Llambias who stated we'd receive a Rangers Retail dividend in December not Easdale. The Puma royalty should be £5.10 to Rangers and £4.90 to SD as the split should be 51/49 not 50/50, I did point that out and it was acknowledged in the meeting.
  24. forlanssister
    Like I said in another thread one political act to stymie another political act.
  25. forlanssister
    Wonder if anyone associated with us was present ?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.